• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Linear combinations of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories.线性组合生物标志物以提高具有三个有序诊断类别的诊断准确性。
Stat Med. 2013 Feb 20;32(4):631-43. doi: 10.1002/sim.5542. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
2
Optimal linear combination of biomarkers for multi-category diagnosis.用于多类别诊断的生物标志物的最佳线性组合。
Stat Med. 2016 Jan 30;35(2):202-13. doi: 10.1002/sim.6622. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
3
Confidence interval estimation of the difference between two sensitivities to the early disease stage.两种针对疾病早期阶段敏感性差异的置信区间估计。
Biom J. 2014 Mar;56(2):270-86. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201200012. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
4
Confidence intervals for differences between volumes under receiver operating characteristic surfaces (VUS) and generalized Youden indices (GYIs).受试者工作特征曲线下体积(VUS)与广义约登指数(GYI)差异的置信区间。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Mar;27(3):675-688. doi: 10.1177/0962280217740787. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
5
Diagnostic thresholds with three ordinal groups.具有三个有序组别的诊断阈值。
J Biopharm Stat. 2014;24(3):608-33. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.888437.
6
Estimating diagnostic accuracy for clustered ordinal diagnostic groups in the three-class case-Application to the early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease.三类情况下聚类有序诊断组的诊断准确性估计——在阿尔茨海默病早期诊断中的应用
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Mar;27(3):701-714. doi: 10.1177/0962280217742539. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
7
Predictive inference for best linear combination of biomarkers subject to limits of detection.受检测限影响的生物标志物最佳线性组合的预测推断。
Stat Med. 2017 Aug 15;36(18):2844-2874. doi: 10.1002/sim.7317. Epub 2017 May 28.
8
Estimation of the volume under the receiver-operating characteristic surface adjusting for non-ignorable verification bias.在考虑不可忽略的验证偏倚的情况下,对接受者操作特征曲面下的体积进行估计。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Mar;27(3):715-739. doi: 10.1177/0962280217742541. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
9
Linear combination methods to improve diagnostic/prognostic accuracy on future observations.用于提高对未来观察结果的诊断/预后准确性的线性组合方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Aug;25(4):1359-80. doi: 10.1177/0962280213481053. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
10
A new diagnostic accuracy measure and cut-point selection criterion.一种新的诊断准确性测量方法和切点选择标准。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Dec;26(6):2832-2852. doi: 10.1177/0962280215611631. Epub 2015 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Combining multiple biomarkers linearly to minimize the Euclidean distance of the closest point on the receiver operating characteristic surface to the perfection corner in trichotomous settings.在三分设置中,通过线性组合多个生物标志物,使接收者操作特征曲面最近点到完美角落的欧几里得距离最小化。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Apr;33(4):647-668. doi: 10.1177/09622802241233768. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
2
Estimating the optimal linear combination of predictors using spherically constrained optimization.使用球约束优化估计预测因子的最优线性组合。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2022 Oct 19;23(Suppl 3):436. doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-04953-y.
3
Semiparametric isotonic regression analysis for risk assessment under nested case-control and case-cohort designs.嵌套病例对照和病例队列设计下用于风险评估的半参数等距回归分析。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Aug;29(8):2328-2343. doi: 10.1177/0962280219893389. Epub 2019 Dec 22.
4
Combining multiple biomarkers linearly to maximize the partial area under the ROC curve.将多个生物标志物线性组合以最大化 ROC 曲线下的部分面积。
Stat Med. 2018 Feb 20;37(4):627-642. doi: 10.1002/sim.7535. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
5
Exact p-values for Simon's two-stage designs in clinical trials.临床试验中西蒙两阶段设计的确切p值。
Stat Biosci. 2016;8(2):351-357. doi: 10.1007/s12561-016-9152-1. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
6
A combination of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the GRACE risk score better predicts PCI outcomes in Chinese Han patients with acute coronary syndrome.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和GRACE风险评分相结合能更好地预测中国汉族急性冠脉综合征患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结局。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2015;15(12):995-1001. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2015.6174.
7
Combining large number of weak biomarkers based on AUC.基于曲线下面积(AUC)合并大量弱生物标志物。
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 20;34(29):3811-30. doi: 10.1002/sim.6600. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
8
Diagnostic thresholds with three ordinal groups.具有三个有序组别的诊断阈值。
J Biopharm Stat. 2014;24(3):608-33. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.888437.
9
Linear combination methods to improve diagnostic/prognostic accuracy on future observations.用于提高对未来观察结果的诊断/预后准确性的线性组合方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Aug;25(4):1359-80. doi: 10.1177/0962280213481053. Epub 2013 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

1
A min-max combination of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy.采用最小最大组合生物标志物提高诊断准确性。
Stat Med. 2011 Jul 20;30(16):2005-14. doi: 10.1002/sim.4238. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
2
The Optimal Linear Combination of Multiple Predictors Under the Generalized Linear Models.广义线性模型下多个预测变量的最优线性组合
Stat Probab Lett. 2009 Nov 15;79(22):2321-2327. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2009.08.002.
3
Item response theory facilitated cocalibrating cognitive tests and reduced bias in estimated rates of decline.项目反应理论有助于共同校准认知测试,并减少估计衰退率中的偏差。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;61(10):1018-27.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.011. Epub 2008 May 5.
4
The meaning and use of the volume under a three-class ROC surface (VUS).三类ROC曲面下的体积(VUS)的意义及应用。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 May;27(5):577-88. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2007.908687.
5
A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.对三个有序诊断组的诊断准确性进行参数比较。
Biom J. 2007 Aug;49(5):682-93. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200610359.
6
Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.存在三个有序诊断组时测量和估计诊断准确性
Stat Med. 2006 Apr 15;25(7):1251-73. doi: 10.1002/sim.2433.
7
Combining biomarkers to detect disease with application to prostate cancer.结合生物标志物进行疾病检测及其在前列腺癌中的应用。
Biostatistics. 2003 Oct;4(4):523-38. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/4.4.523.
8
Combining diagnostic test results to increase accuracy.结合诊断测试结果以提高准确性。
Biostatistics. 2000 Jun;1(2):123-40. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/1.2.123.
9
Emerging molecular markers of cancer.癌症的新兴分子标志物
Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Mar;2(3):210-9. doi: 10.1038/nrc755.
10
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules.临床痴呆评定量表(CDR):当前版本及评分规则。
Neurology. 1993 Nov;43(11):2412-4. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a.

线性组合生物标志物以提高具有三个有序诊断类别的诊断准确性。

Linear combinations of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, State University of New York at Buffalo, 706 Kimball Tower, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214, U.S.A.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2013 Feb 20;32(4):631-43. doi: 10.1002/sim.5542. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1002/sim.5542
PMID:22865796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4351049/
Abstract

Many researchers have addressed the problem of finding the optimal linear combination of biomarkers to maximize the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for scenarios with binary disease status. In practice, many disease processes such as Alzheimer can be naturally classified into three diagnostic categories such as normal, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease (AD), and for such diseases the volume under the ROC surface (VUS) is the most commonly used index of diagnostic accuracy. In this article, we propose a few parametric and nonparametric approaches to address the problem of finding the optimal linear combination to maximize the VUS. We carried out simulation studies to investigate the performance of the proposed methods. We apply all of the investigated approaches to a real data set from a cohort study in early stage AD.

摘要

许多研究人员已经解决了这个问题,即找到最优的线性组合生物标志物,以最大化用于二元疾病状态情况下的接收器操作特性 (ROC) 曲线下面积。在实践中,许多疾病过程,如阿尔茨海默病,可以自然地分为三个诊断类别,如正常、轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病 (AD),对于这类疾病,ROC 曲线下面积 (VUS) 是最常用的诊断准确性指标。在本文中,我们提出了一些参数和非参数方法来解决寻找最优线性组合以最大化 VUS 的问题。我们进行了模拟研究来评估所提出方法的性能。我们将所有研究的方法应用于来自早期 AD 队列研究的真实数据集。