Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Ann Surg. 2012 Sep;256(3):487-93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318265819c.
Using a national database, we asked whether video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is beneficial in high-risk pulmonary patients.
Single-institution series demonstrated benefit of VATS lobectomy over lobectomy via thoracotomy in poor pulmonary function patients [FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) or DLCO (diffusion capacity of the lung to carbon monoxide) <60% predicted].
The STS General Thoracic Database was queried for patients having undergone lobectomy by either thoracotomy or VATS between 2000 and 2010. Postoperative pulmonary complications included those defined by the STS database.
In the STS database, 12,970 patients underwent lobectomy (thoracotomy, n = 8439; VATS, n = 4531) and met inclusion criteria. The overall rate of pulmonary complications was 21.7% (1832/8439) and 17.8% (806/4531) in patients undergoing lobectomy with thoracotomy and VATS, respectively (P < 0.0001). In a multivariable model of pulmonary complications, thoracotomy approach (OR = 1.25, P < 0.001), decreasing FEV1% predicted (OR = 1.01 per unit, P < 0.001) and DLCO% predicted (OR = 1.01 per unit, P < 0.001), and increasing age (1.02 per year, P < 0.001) independently predicted pulmonary complications. When examining pulmonary complications in patients with FEV1 less than 60% predicted, thoracotomy patients have markedly increased pulmonary complications when compared with VATS patients (P = 0.023). No significant difference is noted with FEV1 more than 60% predicted.
Poor pulmonary function predicts respiratory complications regardless of approach. Respiratory complications increase at a significantly greater rate in lobectomy patients with poor pulmonary function after thoracotomy compared with VATS. Planned surgical approach should be considered while determining whether a high-risk patient is an appropriate resection candidate.
利用国家数据库,我们研究了电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺叶切除术是否对高危肺部患者有益。
单中心系列研究表明,在肺功能较差的患者(FEV1(1 秒用力呼气量)或 DLCO(一氧化碳扩散能力)<60%预计值)中,VATS 肺叶切除术优于开胸肺叶切除术。
通过 STS 普通胸科数据库,检索 2000 年至 2010 年间接受开胸或 VATS 肺叶切除术的患者。术后肺部并发症包括 STS 数据库定义的并发症。
在 STS 数据库中,有 12970 名患者接受了肺叶切除术(开胸术,n=8439;VATS,n=4531)并符合纳入标准。开胸组肺并发症的总发生率为 21.7%(1832/8439),VATS 组为 17.8%(806/4531)(P<0.0001)。在多变量模型中,开胸术(OR=1.25,P<0.001)、降低 FEV1%预测值(OR=每单位 1.01,P<0.001)和 DLCO%预测值(OR=每单位 1.01,P<0.001)、年龄增加(每年 1.02,P<0.001)独立预测肺并发症。当检查 FEV1 低于 60%预测值的患者的肺部并发症时,与 VATS 患者相比,开胸术患者的肺部并发症明显增加(P=0.023)。对于 FEV1 超过 60%预测值的患者,没有显著差异。
无论手术方式如何,肺功能差都预示着呼吸并发症。与 VATS 相比,肺功能差的开胸肺叶切除术患者的肺部并发症发生率显著增加。在确定高危患者是否适合手术切除时,应考虑手术方式。