Natale JoAnne E, Joseph Jill G, Rogers Alexander J, Mahajan Prashant, Cooper Arthur, Wisner David H, Miskin Michelle L, Hoyle John D, Atabaki Shireen M, Dayan Peter S, Holmes James F, Kuppermann Nathan
Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, 2516 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. joanne.natale @ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Aug;166(8):732-7. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.307.
To determine if patient race/ethnicity is independently associated with cranial computed tomography (CT) use among children with minor blunt head trauma.
Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study.
Pediatric research network of 25 North American emergency departments.
In total, 42 412 children younger than 18 years were seen within 24 hours of minor blunt head trauma. Of these, 39 717 were of documented white non-Hispanic, black non-Hispanic, or Hispanic race/ethnicity. Using a previously validated clinical prediction rule, we classified each child's risk for clinically important traumatic brain injury to describe injury severity. Because no meaningful differences in cranial CT rates were observed between children of black non-Hispanic race/ethnicity vs Hispanic race/ethnicity, we combined these 2 groups.
Cranial CT use in the emergency department, stratified by race/ethnicity.
In total, 13 793 children (34.7%) underwent cranial CT. The odds of undergoing cranial CT among children with minor blunt head trauma who were at higher risk for clinically important traumatic brain injury did not differ by race/ethnicity. In adjusted analyses, children of black non-Hispanic or Hispanic race/ethnicity had lower odds of undergoing cranial CT among those who were at intermediate risk (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78-0.96) or lowest risk (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.80) for clinically important traumatic brain injury. Regardless of risk for clinically important traumatic brain injury, parental anxiety and request was commonly cited by physicians as an important influence for ordering cranial CT in children of white non-Hispanic race/ethnicity.
Disparities may arise from the overuse of cranial CT among patients of nonminority races/ethnicities. Further studies should focus on explaining how medically irrelevant factors, such as patient race/ethnicity, can affect physician decision making, resulting in exposure of children to unnecessary health care risks.
确定在轻度钝性头部外伤儿童中,患者种族/族裔是否与头颅计算机断层扫描(CT)的使用独立相关。
一项前瞻性队列研究的二次分析。
北美25个急诊科的儿科研究网络。
共有42412名18岁以下儿童在轻度钝性头部外伤后24小时内就诊。其中,39717名儿童记录为非西班牙裔白人、非西班牙裔黑人或西班牙裔种族/族裔。使用先前验证的临床预测规则,我们对每个儿童发生具有临床意义的创伤性脑损伤的风险进行分类,以描述损伤的严重程度。由于在非西班牙裔黑人种族/族裔儿童与西班牙裔种族/族裔儿童之间未观察到头颅CT使用率的有意义差异,我们将这两组合并。
急诊科头颅CT的使用情况,按种族/族裔分层。
共有13793名儿童(34.7%)接受了头颅CT检查。在具有临床意义的创伤性脑损伤高风险的轻度钝性头部外伤儿童中,接受头颅CT检查的几率在不同种族/族裔之间没有差异。在调整分析中,非西班牙裔黑人或西班牙裔种族/族裔的儿童在具有临床意义的创伤性脑损伤中度风险(比值比,0.86;95%CI,0.78 - 0.96)或低风险(比值比,0.72;95%CI,0.65 - 0.80)的人群中接受头颅CT检查的几率较低。无论具有临床意义的创伤性脑损伤风险如何,医生普遍认为父母的焦虑和请求是为非西班牙裔白人种族/族裔儿童开具头颅CT检查的重要影响因素。
差异可能源于非少数种族/族裔患者过度使用头颅CT。进一步的研究应侧重于解释诸如患者种族/族裔等医学无关因素如何影响医生的决策,导致儿童面临不必要的医疗风险。