• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的亚洲 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,600 毫克与 300 毫克负荷剂量氯吡格雷的效果:长期随访研究。

Effects of 600 mg versus 300 mg loading dose of clopidogrel in Asian patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: long-term follow-up study.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2012 Sep;53(5):906-14. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.5.906.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2012.53.5.906
PMID:22869472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3423857/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The optimum loading dose of clopidogrel has not been established in Asian patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of different clopidogrel loading doses on short- and long-term clinical outcomes in Asian STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 691 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, loaded with 600 mg (n=381) or 300 mg (n=310) of clopidogrel. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as a composite of all-cause death, reinfarction, or target vessel revascularization (TVR).

RESULTS

Baseline clinical and peri-procedural characteristics were mostly comparable between the 600 mg and 300 mg groups. There were no differences in 1 month MACEs as well as all-cause death, reinfarction, TVR, and stent thrombosis between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 921 days, MACEs [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the 600 mg group 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-3.97, p=0.153], all-cause death (adjusted HR for the 600 mg group 0.97, 95% CI: 0.50-1.88, p=0.928), reinfarction (adjusted HR for the 600 mg group 1.03, 95% CI: 0.55-1.91, p=0.937), and TVR (adjusted HR for the 600 mg group 1.36, 95% CI: 0.68-2.69, p=0.388) did not differ between the two groups. These results were reliable even after analysis of propensity score-matched population, and were also constant among various subgroups.

CONCLUSION

A 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel did not result in better short- and long-term clinical outcomes in Asian STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.

摘要

目的

在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的亚洲 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中,氯吡格雷的最佳负荷剂量尚未确定。我们的目的是评估亚洲 STEMI 患者接受直接 PCI 时不同氯吡格雷负荷剂量对短期和长期临床结局的影响。

材料和方法

我们研究了 691 例接受直接 PCI 的 STEMI 患者,分别给予 600mg(n=381)或 300mg(n=310)氯吡格雷负荷量。主要不良心脏事件(MACE)为主要终点,定义为全因死亡、再梗死或靶血管血运重建(TVR)的复合终点。

结果

两组患者的基线临床和围术期特征基本相似。两组 1 个月时的 MACE 发生率、全因死亡、再梗死、TVR 和支架血栓形成无差异。中位随访 921 天后,MACE[600mg 组调整后的危险比(HR)为 1.79,95%置信区间(CI):0.80-3.97,p=0.153]、全因死亡(600mg 组调整后的 HR 为 0.97,95%CI:0.50-1.88,p=0.928)、再梗死(600mg 组调整后的 HR 为 1.03,95%CI:0.55-1.91,p=0.937)和 TVR(600mg 组调整后的 HR 为 1.36,95%CI:0.68-2.69,p=0.388)差异无统计学意义。即使在倾向评分匹配人群的分析中,这些结果也是可靠的,而且在各种亚组中也是一致的。

结论

在亚洲 STEMI 患者接受直接 PCI 时,600mg 氯吡格雷负荷剂量并未带来更好的短期和长期临床结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c484/3423857/24717f810f34/ymj-53-906-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c484/3423857/dcfa7c015759/ymj-53-906-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c484/3423857/fcf0f5da99b4/ymj-53-906-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c484/3423857/24717f810f34/ymj-53-906-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c484/3423857/dcfa7c015759/ymj-53-906-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c484/3423857/fcf0f5da99b4/ymj-53-906-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c484/3423857/24717f810f34/ymj-53-906-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of 600 mg versus 300 mg loading dose of clopidogrel in Asian patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: long-term follow-up study.在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的亚洲 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,600 毫克与 300 毫克负荷剂量氯吡格雷的效果:长期随访研究。
Yonsei Med J. 2012 Sep;53(5):906-14. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.5.906.
2
Safety of Prasugrel Loading Doses in Patients Pre-Loaded With Clopidogrel in the Setting of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results of a Nonrandomized Observational Study.在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中,患者预先使用氯吡格雷后给予普拉格雷负荷剂量的安全性:一项非随机观察性研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;8(8):1064-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.03.023.
3
Role of clopidogrel loading dose in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty: results from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial.氯吡格雷负荷剂量在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的作用:HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死血管重建和支架置入的协调结果)试验结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Oct 6;54(15):1438-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.021.
4
Efficacy of high-dose atorvastatin loading before primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the STATIN STEMI trial.大剂量阿托伐他汀在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前的疗效:STIN 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Mar;3(3):332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.11.021.
5
Comparison of 600 versus 300-mg Clopidogrel loading dose in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary angioplasty.比较 600 毫克与 300 毫克氯吡格雷负荷剂量在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Nov 1;106(9):1208-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.044.
6
Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死患者中生物可降解聚合物生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的对比
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 15;183:190-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.01.036. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
7
Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction according to timing of percutaneous coronary intervention: a TRITON-TIMI 38 subgroup analysis (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38).根据经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的时间,替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的疗效比较:TRITON-TIMI 38 亚组分析(评估通过优化血小板抑制改善治疗结果的试验:替格瑞洛在心肌梗死中的疗效 38)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun;7(6):604-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.01.160.
8
Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: RACES-MI trial.随机比较依维莫司洗脱支架和西罗莫司洗脱支架在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:RACES-MI 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):849-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.016.
9
Double-blind, randomized, prospective comparison of loading doses of 600 mg clopidogrel versus 60 mg prasugrel in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction scheduled for primary percutaneous intervention: the ETAMI trial (early thienopyridine treatment to improve primary PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction).双盲、随机、前瞻性比较 600mg 氯吡格雷与 60mg 普拉格雷在拟行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的负荷剂量:ETAMI 试验(早期噻吩吡啶治疗改善急性心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt B):147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
10
Long-Term outcome of drug-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the paclitaxel- or sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare metal stent in Primary Angioplasty (PASEO) Randomized Trial.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死的长期疗效比较:紫杉醇或西罗莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PASEO)随机试验中的结果
Circulation. 2009 Sep 15;120(11):964-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.830372. Epub 2009 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Shenzhu Guanxin Recipe () on patients with angina pectoris after percutaneous coronary intervention: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.参术冠心方()对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心绞痛患者的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Chin J Integr Med. 2015 Jun;21(6):408-16. doi: 10.1007/s11655-015-2040-6. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
2
Reappraisal of thienopyridine pretreatment in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者噻吩并吡啶预处理的重新评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2014 Oct 24;349:g6269. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6269.

本文引用的文献

1
Standard- vs high-dose clopidogrel based on platelet function testing after percutaneous coronary intervention: the GRAVITAS randomized trial.基于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血小板功能检测的标准剂量与高剂量氯吡格雷:GRAVITAS 随机试验。
JAMA. 2011 Mar 16;305(11):1097-105. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.290.
2
Standard versus high loading doses of clopidogrel in Asian ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.标准与高负荷剂量氯吡格雷在亚洲 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用:来自韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究的启示。
Am Heart J. 2011 Feb;161(2):373-382.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.031. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
3
Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes (CURRENT-OASIS 7): a randomised factorial trial.
急性冠状动脉综合征患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时的双联(氯吡格雷标准剂量与双倍剂量和阿司匹林低剂量与高剂量)治疗(CURRENT-OASIS 7):一项随机析因试验。
Lancet. 2010 Oct 9;376(9748):1233-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61088-4.
4
Carriage of cytochrome 2C19 polymorphism is associated with risk of high post-treatment platelet reactivity on high maintenance-dose clopidogrel of 150 mg/day: results of the ACCEL-DOUBLE (Accelerated Platelet Inhibition by a Double Dose of Clopidogrel According to Gene Polymorphism) study.细胞色素 2C19 多态性携带与高维持剂量(150mg/天)氯吡格雷治疗后高血小板反应风险相关:根据基因多态性的双重剂量氯吡格雷加速血小板抑制(ACCEL-DOUBLE)研究结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jul;3(7):731-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.05.007.
5
The significance of clopidogrel low-responsiveness on stent thrombosis and cardiac death assessed by the verifynow p(2)y(12) assay in patients with acute coronary syndrome within 6 months after drug-eluting stent implantation.在药物洗脱支架置入后 6 个月内的急性冠脉综合征患者中,通过 verifynow p(2)y(12) 检测评估氯吡格雷低反应性对支架血栓和心脏死亡的意义。
Korean Circ J. 2009 Dec;39(12):512-8. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2009.39.12.512. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
6
Efficacy of triple anti-platelet therapy including cilostazol in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation.三抗血小板治疗(包括西洛他唑)在急性心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的疗效。
Korean Circ J. 2009 May;39(5):190-7. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2009.39.5.190. Epub 2009 May 28.
7
2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2009聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理指南(更新2004年指南和2007年聚焦更新)以及美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南(更新2005年指南和2007年聚焦更新):美国心脏病学基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2009 Dec 1;120(22):2271-306. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192663. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
8
Role of clopidogrel loading dose in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty: results from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial.氯吡格雷负荷剂量在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的作用:HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死血管重建和支架置入的协调结果)试验结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Oct 6;54(15):1438-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.021.
9
Triple versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时三联抗血小板治疗与双联抗血小板治疗的比较
Circulation. 2009 Jun 30;119(25):3207-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.822791. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
10
Randomized comparison of adjunctive cilostazol versus high maintenance dose clopidogrel in patients with high post-treatment platelet reactivity: results of the ACCEL-RESISTANCE (Adjunctive Cilostazol Versus High Maintenance Dose Clopidogrel in Patients With Clopidogrel Resistance) randomized study.高治疗后血小板反应性患者中,西洛他唑辅助治疗与高维持剂量氯吡格雷的随机对照研究:ACCEL-RESISTANCE(氯吡格雷抵抗患者中西洛他唑辅助治疗与高维持剂量氯吡格雷)随机研究结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Mar 31;53(13):1101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.025.