• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾细胞癌(<7cm)肾周浸润的预后意义。

Prognostic significance of perirenal infiltration in renal cell carcinoma (<7 cm).

机构信息

Department of Urology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan 614-735, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2012 Sep;53(5):940-3. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.5.940.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2012.53.5.940
PMID:22869476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3423853/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Pathologic stage is the most accurate prognostic factor of renal cell carcinoma. We evaluated whether perirenal fat infiltration is a significant factor in tumors 7 cm or less in size.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the record of 164 cases of tumors 7 cm or less in size. We divided the patients into two groups according to the presence of perirenal fat infiltration (group A, pT1; group B, pT3a). We evaluated relationships, recurrence-free survival and disease-specific survival according to clinicopathologic parameters. Statistical differences were calculated by log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total 131 patients were included in group A, with a mean age of 55.8 years, average tumor size was 4.2 cm, and a mean follow-up period of 43 months. Group B included 33 patients, with a mean age of 55.9 years, an average tumor size of 4.1 cm, and a mean follow-up period of 38 months. There was no significant difference in disease-specific survival; however, recurrence-free survival showed significantly different between two groups (group A: 95.5%, group B: 84.4%).

CONCLUSION

In this study, perirenal fat infiltration proved to be an independent prognostic factor for predicting disease-free survival in patients with tumors of 7 cm or less in size. Therefore, as this study showed, the presence of perirenal fat infiltration requires stricter follow-up planning, even in small renal cell carcinoma.

摘要

目的

病理分期是肾细胞癌最准确的预后因素。我们评估了肾周脂肪浸润是否是肿瘤大小为 7cm 或更小的重要因素。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了 164 例肿瘤大小为 7cm 或更小的患者记录。根据是否存在肾周脂肪浸润,我们将患者分为两组(A 组,pT1;B 组,pT3a)。我们根据临床病理参数评估了相关性、无复发生存率和疾病特异性生存率。采用对数秩检验计算统计学差异。

结果

A 组共 131 例患者,平均年龄 55.8 岁,平均肿瘤大小为 4.2cm,平均随访时间为 43 个月。B 组包括 33 例患者,平均年龄 55.9 岁,平均肿瘤大小为 4.1cm,平均随访时间为 38 个月。疾病特异性生存率无显著差异;然而,无复发生存率两组间差异有统计学意义(A 组:95.5%,B 组:84.4%)。

结论

在本研究中,肾周脂肪浸润被证明是预测肿瘤大小为 7cm 或更小的患者无复发生存率的独立预后因素。因此,正如本研究所示,即使是小的肾细胞癌,肾周脂肪浸润的存在也需要更严格的随访计划。

相似文献

1
Prognostic significance of perirenal infiltration in renal cell carcinoma (<7 cm).肾细胞癌(<7cm)肾周浸润的预后意义。
Yonsei Med J. 2012 Sep;53(5):940-3. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.5.940.
2
Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.肾周脂肪浸润和肿瘤大小在肾细胞癌中的预后意义
J Urol. 2008 Aug;180(2):486-91; discussion 491. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.034. Epub 2008 Jun 11.
3
Reevaluation of renal cell carcinoma and perirenal fat invasion only.仅对肾细胞癌和肾周脂肪浸润进行重新评估。
J Urol. 2009 Nov;182(5):2137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.065. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
4
Prognostic value of perirenal and/or sinus fat infiltration in patients with pT3a renal cell carcinoma: A multicentre cohort study. LARCG Group.pT3a期肾细胞癌患者肾周和/或窦脂肪浸润的预后价值:一项多中心队列研究。LARCG组
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Nov;43(9):495-502. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
Current TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma evaluated: revising stage T3a.评估肾细胞癌当前的TNM分类:修订T3a期。
J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):33-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000146719.43269.e8.
6
Evaluation of the prognostic significance of perirenal fat invasion and tumor size in patients with pT1-pT3a localized renal cell carcinoma in a comprehensive multicenter study of the CORONA project. Can we improve prognostic discrimination for patients with stage pT3a tumors?在 CORONA 项目的一项综合多中心研究中评估肾细胞癌患者 pT1-pT3a 局限性肿瘤中肾周脂肪侵犯和肿瘤大小的预后意义。我们能否改善 pT3a 期肿瘤患者的预后判别?
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):943-51. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.055. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
7
Tumor size and Fuhrman grade further enhance the prognostic impact of perinephric fat invasion and renal vein extension in T3a staging of renal cell carcinoma.肿瘤大小和富尔曼分级进一步增强了肾周脂肪浸润和肾静脉受累在肾细胞癌T3a分期中的预后影响。
Int J Urol. 2017 Jan;24(1):51-58. doi: 10.1111/iju.13237. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
8
Significance of tumor size in renal cell cancer with perinephric fat infiltration: is TNM staging system adequate for predicting prognosis?肿瘤大小在伴有肾周脂肪浸润的肾细胞癌中的意义:TNM分期系统是否足以预测预后?
Urol J. 2013 Winter;10(1):774-9.
9
Perinephric and renal sinus fat infiltration in pT3a renal cell carcinoma: possible prognostic differences.pT3a期肾细胞癌的肾周和肾窦脂肪浸润:可能的预后差异
BJU Int. 2009 May;103(10):1349-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08236.x. Epub 2008 Dec 8.
10
High perirenal fat thickness predicts a poor progression-free survival in patients with localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma.肾周脂肪厚度高预示局限性透明细胞肾细胞癌患者无进展生存期较差。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Apr;36(4):157.e1-157.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.12.011. Epub 2018 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Histopathological validation of safe margin for nephron-sparing surgery based on individual tumor growth pattern.基于肿瘤个体化生长模式的肾部分切除术安全切缘的组织病理学验证。
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug 28;19(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02375-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Reevaluation of renal cell carcinoma and perirenal fat invasion only.仅对肾细胞癌和肾周脂肪浸润进行重新评估。
J Urol. 2009 Nov;182(5):2137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.065. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
2
Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.肾周脂肪浸润和肿瘤大小在肾细胞癌中的预后意义
J Urol. 2008 Aug;180(2):486-91; discussion 491. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.034. Epub 2008 Jun 11.
3
Does stage T3a renal cell carcinoma embrace a homogeneous group of patients?T3a期肾细胞癌患者群体是否具有同质性?
J Urol. 2007 May;177(5):1682-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.064.
4
Prognostic relevance of tumour size in T3a renal cell carcinoma: a multicentre experience.T3a期肾细胞癌肿瘤大小的预后相关性:一项多中心研究经验
Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.106. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
5
Reevaluation of TNM staging of renal cortical tumors: recurrence and survival for T1N0M0 and T3aN0M0 tumors are equivalent.肾皮质肿瘤TNM分期的重新评估:T1N0M0和T3aN0M0肿瘤的复发率和生存率相当。
Urology. 2006 Aug;68(2):287-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.02.012.
6
2004 WHO classification of the renal tumors of the adults.2004年世界卫生组织成人肾肿瘤分类
Eur Urol. 2006 May;49(5):798-805. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.035. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
7
Progression and long-term survival after simple enucleation for the elective treatment of renal cell carcinoma: experience in 107 patients.单纯眼球摘除术择期治疗肾细胞癌后的进展与长期生存:107例患者的经验
J Urol. 2005 Jul;174(1):57-60; discussion 60. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000162019.45820.53.
8
Pathological stage does not alter the prognosis for renal lesions determined to be stage T1 by computerized tomography.病理分期不改变经计算机断层扫描确定为T1期的肾脏病变的预后。
J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):713-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000153638.15018.58.
9
Re-evaluation of the Tumour-Node-Metastasis staging of locally advanced renal cortical tumours: absolute size (T2) is more significant than renal capsular invasion (T3a).局部晚期肾皮质肿瘤的肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期再评估:绝对大小(T2)比肾包膜侵犯(T3a)更具意义。
BJU Int. 2005 Jan;95(1):27-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05244.x.
10
Current TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma evaluated: revising stage T3a.评估肾细胞癌当前的TNM分类:修订T3a期。
J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):33-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000146719.43269.e8.