Cao Li-Ying, Jiang Ming-Jing, Yang Sheng-Ping, Zhao Long, Wang Jian-Min
Department of Orthopaedics, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2012 May;25(5):384-8.
To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.
Based on the principles and methods of Cochrane systematic reviews, the authors searched the Cochrane Library (2012, 2 issue), PubMed (1966 to February, 2012), EMBASE (1974 to February, 2012), Chinese Biomedicine Database (1978 to February, 2012), China Journal Full-text Database (1979 to February, 2012), VIP database (1989 to February, 2012), as well as search engine Google Scholar. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy to treat knee osteoarthritis were included. The authors assessed the quality of the included trials according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version. The Cochrane Collaboration's software RevMan 5.1 was used for meta-analysis.
Five RCTs totaling 331 patients were included. The results showed that compared with placebo control treatment, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy had little clinical benefit in relieving the pain of knee osteoarthritis [WMD=0.12, 95%CI (-0.46,0.69)], reducing morning stiffness time [WMD=0.08, 95%CI (-0.05, 0.21)] and improving the knee function [WMD=-1.16, 95%CI (-4.36, 2.05)]. There were no significant differences between the two groups.
The effects of Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for treating knee osteoarthritis need more powerful trails to be confirmed. The above conclusions still need more high-quality randomized controlled trails to be verified owing to the limitations of the number and the quality of systematic review included studies.
评估脉冲电磁场疗法治疗膝关节骨关节炎的临床疗效。
基于Cochrane系统评价的原则和方法,作者检索了Cochrane图书馆(2012年第2期)、PubMed(1966年至2012年2月)、EMBASE(1974年至2012年2月)、中国生物医学数据库(1978年至2012年2月)、中国期刊全文数据库(1979年至2012年2月)、维普数据库(1989年至2012年2月)以及搜索引擎谷歌学术。纳入脉冲电磁场疗法治疗膝关节骨关节炎的随机对照试验(RCT)。作者根据《Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册》对纳入试验的质量进行评估。采用Cochrane协作网的RevMan 5.1软件进行荟萃分析。
共纳入5项RCT,总计331例患者。结果显示,与安慰剂对照治疗相比,脉冲电磁场疗法在缓解膝关节骨关节炎疼痛[加权均数差(WMD)=0.12,95%置信区间(CI)(-0.46,0.69)]、缩短晨僵时间[WMD=0.08,95%CI(-0.05,0.21)]及改善膝关节功能[WMD=-1.16,95%CI(-4.36,2.05)]方面临床获益甚微。两组间无显著差异。
脉冲电磁场疗法治疗膝关节骨关节炎的效果需要更有力的试验来证实。由于纳入系统评价研究的数量和质量存在局限性,上述结论仍需更多高质量随机对照试验来验证。