Zhang Yan-fang, Li Qiong-fen, Chen Lei, Wang Yi, Wei Hui-ming, Qian Chuan-yun
Department of Emergency Intensive Care Unit, First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2012 Aug;24(8):478-81.
To evaluate the effects of fluid management strategies in early goal directed therapy (EGDT) on the prognosis of patients with shock.
Clinical data of 79 patients with septic shock or hemorrhagic shock admitted to emergency intensive care unit (EICU) of the First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into continual fluid administrating group (n=41) in accordance with protocol calculating approximating fluid volume and adjust the infusion speed based on blood pressure, heart rate, pulse saturation of blood oxygen (SpO(2)) and urine output with the end of fluid resuscitation was set to restore spontaneous circulation function and wean off vasoactive drugs, and the conservative fluid resuscitation group (n=38) by means of using vasoactive agents to maintenance blood pressure after infusing amount (20 ml/kg) of liquid early, respectively. The 28-day mortality and the time of using pressure agents were compared between two groups. According to the 28-day mortality, patients were further divided into the survival group (n=37) and death group (n=42), and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHEII) score was compared between two groups. Logistic regression analysis of prognostic factors was conducted to identify and describe the relationship between the prognosis and fluid resuscitation methods and strategies.
The 28-day mortality of continual fluid administrating group was significantly lower than that of the conservative fluid resuscitation group (14.63% vs. 94.74%, P<0.01), total drugs supporting time (hours) was significantly shorter than that in conservative fluid resuscitation group (33.24±17.56 vs. 58.29±34.78, P<0.05). Thirty-six cases of 42 death patients received conservative fluid resuscitation (85.7%), but 35 cases of 37 survival patients received continual fluid administration (94.6%). Logistic regression analysis showed that odds ratio (OR) of brain natriuretic peptide before death or shifted out ICU was 0.9136, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.8125 to 0.9986, regression coefficient was -0.0931, P=0.0478, OR of procalcitonin before death or shifted out ICU was 0.9095, 95%CI was 0.8294 to 0.9973, regression coefficient was -0.0949, P=0.0436, and OR of blood lactate level before death or shifted out ICU was 0.5023, 95%CI was 0.2833 to 0.8905, regression coefficient was -0.6885, P=0.0184.
Ongoing fluid resuscitation early in accordance with method to theoretically calculate fluid volume and to adjust infusion speed based on blood pressure, heart rate, SpO(2) and urine, withdrawal of vasoactive drugs, the mortality of patients with shock was significantly reduced.
评估早期目标导向治疗(EGDT)中的液体管理策略对休克患者预后的影响。
回顾性分析云南省第一人民医院急诊重症监护病房(EICU)收治的79例脓毒性休克或失血性休克患者的临床资料。根据方案计算近似液体量,并根据血压、心率、血氧饱和度(SpO₂)和尿量调整输液速度,以恢复自主循环功能并停用血管活性药物为液体复苏终点,将患者分为持续液体输注组(n = 41);另一组为保守液体复苏组(n = 38),早期输注一定量(20 ml/kg)液体后通过使用血管活性药物维持血压。比较两组患者的28天死亡率及使用升压药物的时间。根据28天死亡率,将患者进一步分为存活组(n = 37)和死亡组(n = 42),比较两组急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II(APACHEII)。对预后因素进行Logistic回归分析,以确定并描述预后与液体复苏方法及策略之间的关系。
持续液体输注组的28天死亡率显著低于保守液体复苏组(14.63% 对94.74%,P < 0.01),总药物支持时间(小时)显著短于保守液体复苏组(33.24±17.56对58.29±34.78,P < 0.05)。42例死亡患者中有36例接受保守液体复苏(85.7%),但37例存活患者中有35例接受持续液体输注(94.6%)。Logistic回归分析显示,死亡或转出ICU前脑钠肽的比值比(OR)为0.9136,95%置信区间(95%CI)为0.8125至0.9986,回归系数为 -0.0931,P = 0.0478;死亡或转出ICU前降钙素原的OR为0.9095,95%CI为0.8294至0.9973,回归系数为 -0.0949,P = 0.0436;死亡或转出ICU前血乳酸水平的OR为0.5023,95%CI为0.2833至0.89(此处原文有误,应为0.8905),回归系数为 -0.6885,P = 0.0184。
早期按照理论计算液体量并根据血压、心率、SpO₂和尿量调整输液速度进行持续液体复苏,停用血管活性药物,可显著降低休克患者的死亡率。