Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Columbia University, 622 W 168th St. PH1-137, New York, NY 10032, USA.
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Aug 8;12:70. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-70.
At present, what students read after an outpatient encounter is largely left up to them. Our objective was to evaluate the education efficacy of a clinical education model in which the student moves through a sequence that includes immediately reinforcing their learning using a specifically designed computer tutorial.
Prior to a 14-day Pediatric Emergency rotation, medical students completed pre-tests for two common pediatric topics: Oral Rehydration Solutions (ORS) and Fever Without Source (FWS). After encountering a patient with either FWS or a patient needing ORS, the student logged into a computer that randomly assigned them to either a) completing a relevant computer tutorial (e.g. FWS patient + FWS tutorial = "in sequence") or b) completing the non-relevant tutorial (e.g. FWS patient + ORS tutorial = "out of sequence"). At the end of their rotation, they were tested again on both topics. Our main outcome was post-test scores on a given tutorial topic, contrasted by whether done in- or out-of-sequence.
Ninety-two students completed the study protocol with 41 in the 'in sequence' group. Pre-test scores did not differ significantly. Overall, doing a computer tutorial in sequence resulted in significantly greater post-test scores (z-score 1.1 (SD 0.70) in sequence vs. 0.52 (1.1) out-of-sequence; 95% CI for difference +0.16, +0.93). Students spent longer on the tutorials when they were done in sequence (12.1 min (SD 7.3) vs. 10.5 (6.5)) though the difference was not statistically significant (95% CI diff: -1.2 min, +4.5).
Outpatient learning frameworks could be structured to take best advantage of the heightened learning potential created by patient encounters. We propose the Patient-Teacher-Tutorial sequence as a framework for organizing learning in outpatient clinical settings.
目前,学生在门诊就诊后阅读的内容在很大程度上取决于他们自己。我们的目的是评估一种临床教育模式的教育效果,在这种模式中,学生按照一个顺序进行学习,包括立即使用专门设计的计算机教程来强化他们的学习。
在进行为期 14 天的儿科急诊轮转之前,医学生完成了两个常见儿科主题的预测试:口服补液盐(ORS)和无发热源(FWS)。在遇到 FWS 患者或需要 ORS 的患者后,学生登录计算机,计算机随机将他们分配到以下两种情况之一:a)完成相关的计算机教程(例如,FWS 患者+FWS 教程="顺序")或 b)完成不相关的教程(例如,FWS 患者+ORS 教程="非顺序")。在轮转结束时,他们再次对这两个主题进行测试。我们的主要结果是给定教程主题的后测分数,对比是在顺序还是非顺序完成的。
92 名学生完成了研究方案,其中 41 名学生在"顺序"组。预测试分数没有显著差异。总的来说,按顺序完成计算机教程会导致显著更高的后测分数(顺序组的 z 分数为 1.1(SD 0.70),非顺序组为 0.52(1.1);95%置信区间差异为+0.16,+0.93)。当学生按顺序完成教程时,他们花费的时间更长(顺序组 12.1 分钟(SD 7.3),非顺序组 10.5 分钟(6.5)),尽管差异没有统计学意义(95%置信区间差异:-1.2 分钟,+4.5 分钟)。
门诊学习框架可以构建为充分利用患者就诊带来的增强学习潜力。我们提出"患者-教师-教程"顺序作为组织门诊临床环境中学习的框架。