• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒性休克中最佳的液体复苏量是多少?

How much fluid resuscitation is optimal in septic shock?

作者信息

Russell James A

出版信息

Crit Care. 2012 Aug 8;16(4):146. doi: 10.1186/cc11393.

DOI:10.1186/cc11393
PMID:22873642
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3580685/
Abstract

Smith and Perner report an observational cohort study of 164 patients with septic shock. For patients still alive on day 3, higher compared with lower fluid volume resuscitation was associated with lower 90-day mortality. This association of a relationship between fluid intake and decreased mortality aligns with the randomized controlled trial of early goal-directed therapy and later observational studies. I suggest careful individualization of fluid resuscitation to achieve adequate mean arterial pressure (about 60 to 70 mmHg) and normalization of arterial lactate levels in septic shock.

摘要

史密斯和佩尔纳报告了一项对164例感染性休克患者的观察性队列研究。对于在第3天仍存活的患者,较高液体量复苏与较低液体量复苏相比,90天死亡率更低。液体摄入量与死亡率降低之间的这种关联与早期目标导向治疗的随机对照试验及后来的观察性研究一致。我建议对液体复苏进行仔细个体化,以在感染性休克中实现足够的平均动脉压(约60至70 mmHg)和动脉乳酸水平正常化。

相似文献

1
How much fluid resuscitation is optimal in septic shock?脓毒性休克中最佳的液体复苏量是多少?
Crit Care. 2012 Aug 8;16(4):146. doi: 10.1186/cc11393.
2
Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality.感染性休克的液体复苏:液体正平衡和中心静脉压升高与死亡率增加相关。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):259-65. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feeb15.
3
Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: too much, too little or just right?脓毒性休克中的液体复苏:过多、过少还是恰到好处?
Crit Care. 2012 Jun 29;16(3):436; author reply 436. doi: 10.1186/cc11362.
4
Higher vs. lower fluid volume for septic shock: clinical characteristics and outcome in unselected patients in a prospective, multicenter cohort.脓毒性休克中较高与较低液体量:前瞻性多中心队列中未选择患者的临床特征与结局
Crit Care. 2012 May 8;16(3):R76. doi: 10.1186/cc11333.
5
Initial fluid resuscitation (30 mL/kg) in patients with septic shock: More or less?感染性休克患者的初始液体复苏(30ml/kg):多还是少?
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:309-315. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.016. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
6
What is the optimal fluid status in critically ill patients?危重症患者的最佳液体状态是什么?
Crit Care. 2012 Aug 14;16(4):443. doi: 10.1186/cc11446.
7
Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: the effect of increasing fluid balance on mortality.脓毒性休克中的液体复苏:增加液体平衡对死亡率的影响。
J Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul-Aug;29(4):213-7. doi: 10.1177/0885066613478899. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
8
Prognostic value of extravascular lung water and its potential role in guiding fluid therapy in septic shock after initial resuscitation.血管外肺水在初始复苏后脓毒症休克中的预后价值及其在指导液体治疗中的潜在作用。
J Crit Care. 2016 Jun;33:106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
9
Global end-diastolic volume index vs CVP goal-directed fluid resuscitation for COPD patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial.全球舒张末期容积指数与中心静脉压目标导向液体复苏对慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并感染性休克患者的影响:一项随机对照试验
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):101-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.015. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
10
[Clinical study on the effects of global end-diastolic volume index-directed fluid resuscitation on the prognosis of chronic heart failure patients with septic shock].[舒张末期容积指数指导下的液体复苏对慢性心力衰竭合并感染性休克患者预后影响的临床研究]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2019 Sep 24;47(9):726-730. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2019.09.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of surgical management of high grade blunt splenic injuries in adult trauma patients: a 5-year retrospective cohort study from an academic level I trauma center.成年创伤患者中高级别钝性脾损伤手术治疗的预测因素:来自一级学术创伤中心的5年回顾性队列研究
Patient Saf Surg. 2020 Aug 3;14:32. doi: 10.1186/s13037-020-00257-3. eCollection 2020.
2
Post-ICU admission fluid balance and pediatric septic shock outcomes: a risk-stratified analysis.ICU 后入液平衡与小儿感染性休克结局:风险分层分析。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):397-403. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a64607.
3
Pediatric sepsis: challenges and adjunctive therapies.小儿脓毒症:挑战与辅助治疗。
Crit Care Clin. 2013 Apr;29(2):203-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2012.11.003. Epub 2013 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Higher vs. lower fluid volume for septic shock: clinical characteristics and outcome in unselected patients in a prospective, multicenter cohort.脓毒性休克中较高与较低液体量:前瞻性多中心队列中未选择患者的临床特征与结局
Crit Care. 2012 May 8;16(3):R76. doi: 10.1186/cc11333.
2
Initial fluid resuscitation of patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房感染性休克患者的初始液体复苏。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Apr;55(4):394-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02399.x. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
3
Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality.感染性休克的液体复苏:液体正平衡和中心静脉压升高与死亡率增加相关。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):259-65. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feeb15.
4
Lactate clearance vs central venous oxygen saturation as goals of early sepsis therapy: a randomized clinical trial.乳酸清除率与中心静脉血氧饱和度作为早期脓毒症治疗目标的比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2010 Feb 24;303(8):739-46. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.158.
5
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis.拯救脓毒症运动:以严重脓毒症为目标的基于国际指南的绩效改进计划的结果。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):367-74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cb0cdc.
6
Effectiveness of treatments for severe sepsis: a prospective, multicenter, observational study.严重脓毒症治疗的有效性:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov 1;180(9):861-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200812-1912OC. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
7
The importance of fluid management in acute lung injury secondary to septic shock.脓毒性休克继发急性肺损伤时液体管理的重要性。
Chest. 2009 Jul;136(1):102-109. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2706. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
8
The effect of a quantitative resuscitation strategy on mortality in patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis.定量复苏策略对脓毒症患者死亡率的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):2734-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186f839.
9
Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.西班牙一项多中心严重脓毒症教育项目实施后护理过程及结局的改善
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2294-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294.
10
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克治疗国际指南:2008年版
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41.