Suppr超能文献

葡萄牙的乳腺癌筛查用乳房 X 光检查:来自 2005/2006 年全国健康调查的结果。

Mammography use for breast cancer screening in Portugal: results from the 2005/2006 National Health Survey.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Predictive Medicine and Public Health, University of Porto Medical School, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2013 Jun;23(3):386-92. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks103. Epub 2012 Aug 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding the patterns of mammography use is essential to promote the participation in breast cancer screening.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the patterns of screening mammography use in Portugal.

METHODS

As part of the fourth National Health Survey (2005/2006), 3045 women were evaluated in face-to-face interviews. The previous use of mammography for screening was classified as never or ever, and the latter was further grouped according to the time elapsed since the latest mammography. Having undergone the latest mammography >2 years before was considered underuse. We assessed the determinants of never having been screened by mammography and, among those who had been tested, the determinants of mammography underuse, through age- and education-adjusted odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

RESULTS

Among women aged 45-49 and 50-69 years, 86.3% and 88.0%, respectively, underwent a screening mammography before, and most of them were tested in the previous 2 years. The lowest risk of never having been screened was in Norte (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.21-0.80) and the highest in Açores (OR = 4.04, 95% CI: 2.37-6.92), in comparison with Centro (the region with organized screening for a longer time). Participants with <4 years of formal education were more likely to have never been screened than the more educated (OR = 4.27, 95% CI: 1.67-10.89). Women with private health insurance (OR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.04-0.65), as well as those who had undergone cervical cytology screening before (OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30-0.85), had a lower risk of underuse.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides useful information to improve the allocation of resources to breast cancer screening.

摘要

背景

了解乳房 X 光检查的使用模式对于促进乳腺癌筛查的参与至关重要。

目的

描述葡萄牙的筛查性乳房 X 光检查使用模式。

方法

作为第四次国家健康调查(2005/2006 年)的一部分,对 3045 名妇女进行了面对面访谈。将之前用于筛查的乳房 X 光检查分类为从未或曾经进行过,并根据最近一次乳房 X 光检查以来的时间进一步分组。最新乳房 X 光检查 >2 年前被认为是使用不足。我们评估了从未接受过乳房 X 光检查筛查的决定因素,以及在接受过检查的妇女中,使用不足的决定因素,通过年龄和教育调整的优势比(OR),置信区间(95%CI)为 95%。

结果

在 45-49 岁和 50-69 岁的妇女中,分别有 86.3%和 88.0%接受了筛查性乳房 X 光检查,其中大多数在过去 2 年内接受了检查。从未接受过筛查的风险最低的是 Norte(OR = 0.41,95%CI:0.21-0.80),风险最高的是 Açores(OR = 4.04,95%CI:2.37-6.92),与 Centro(组织筛查时间较长的地区)相比。与受过更多教育的人相比,受教育程度较低的人更有可能从未接受过筛查(OR = 4.27,95%CI:1.67-10.89)。有私人健康保险的妇女(OR = 0.16,95%CI:0.04-0.65)以及之前接受过宫颈细胞学筛查的妇女(OR = 0.50,95%CI:0.30-0.85),使用不足的风险较低。

结论

本研究提供了有用的信息,以改善乳腺癌筛查资源的分配。

相似文献

1
Mammography use for breast cancer screening in Portugal: results from the 2005/2006 National Health Survey.
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Jun;23(3):386-92. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks103. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
2
Cytology use for cervical cancer screening in Portugal: results from the 2005/2006 National Health Survey.
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Apr;24(2):253-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt077. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
3
Mammography Use in Portugal: National Health Survey 2014.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Oct 19;14:E100. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.170054.
4
Social disparities in access to breast and cervical cancer screening by women living in Spain.
Public Health. 2015 Jul;129(7):881-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.02.021. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
6
Cervical cytology use in Portugal: Results from the National Health Survey 2014.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Jul;45(7):1286-1295. doi: 10.1111/jog.13974. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
7
Clustering very low-income, insured women's mammography screening barriers into potentially functional subgroups.
Womens Health Issues. 2012 May-Jun;22(3):e259-66. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
9
Adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening in Spanish women with diabetes: associated factors and trend between 2006 and 2010.
Diabetes Metab. 2012 Apr;38(2):142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
10
Social determinants of mammography screening among women aged 50 to 59, Peru 2015.
Health Care Women Int. 2021 Jan;42(1):92-106. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2020.1786093. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors related to clinical breast examination: A cross-sectional study.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Jun;11(6):3051-3057. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1611_21. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
2
Tendency to Breast Cancer Screening Among Rural Women in Southern Iran: A Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Analysis of Theory of Planned Behavior.
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2022 Sep 6;16:11782234221121001. doi: 10.1177/11782234221121001. eCollection 2022.
3
Breast and cervical cancer screening adherence in Jiangsu, China: An ecological perspective.
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;10:967495. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.967495. eCollection 2022.
4
Determinants of mammography screening in Tehranian women in 2018 based on the health belief model: A cross-sectional study.
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Mar 31;10:119. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_339_20. eCollection 2021.
5
Predictors and Trend in Attendance for Breast Cancer Screening in Lithuania, 2006-2014.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 16;16(22):4535. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224535.
6
Determinants of Tetanus Vaccination among Adult Immigrants: Findings from the Portuguese National Health Survey 2014.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 9;16(9):1619. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091619.
7
Breast cancer in Portugal: Temporal trends and age-specific incidence by geographic regions.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Jun;54:12-18. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
8
Mammography Use in Portugal: National Health Survey 2014.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Oct 19;14:E100. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.170054.
9
Breast Cancer Screening Programmes across the WHO European Region: Differences among Countries Based on National Income Level.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Apr 23;14(4):452. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040452.

本文引用的文献

1
A population-based breast cancer screening programme: conducting a comprehensive survey to explore adherence determinants.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012 May;21(3):349-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2011.01305.x. Epub 2011 Nov 13.
2
Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008.
Int J Cancer. 2010 Dec 15;127(12):2893-917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516.
3
Principles of cancer screening: lessons from history and study design issues.
Semin Oncol. 2010 Jun;37(3):202-15. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.05.006.
5
Breast and cervical cancer screening in Spain and predictors of adherence.
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2010 May;19(3):239-45. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3283372125.
6
The state of the art of cancer control in 30 European countries in 2008.
Int J Cancer. 2010 Jun 1;126(11):2700-15. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24963.
7
Prevalence and determinants of cervical cytology use in an urban sample of Portuguese women.
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2009 Nov;18(6):482-8. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328330eb47.
8
Predisposing factors associated with compliance to biennial breast screening among centers with and without nurses.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Mar;18(3):739-47. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0928. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
9
[Factors related to non-participation in a breast cancer early detection program].
Gac Sanit. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):44-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.01.001. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
10
Risk factors for the incidence of breast cancer: do they affect survival from the disease?
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 10;26(20):3310-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3168.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验