Department of Radiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):49-55. doi: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.5895-12.1. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
We aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of splenic artery embolization (SAE).
A total of 50 patients (male:female, 33:17; mean age, 49 years) who underwent 50 SAEs between 1998 and 2011 were retrospectively studied. The procedure indications included aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm (n=15), gastric variceal hemorrhage (n=15), preoperative reduction of surgical blood loss (n=9), or other (n=11). In total, 22 procedures were elective, and 28 procedures were urgent or emergent. The embolic agents included coils (n=50), gelatin sponges (n=15), and particles (n=4). The measured outcomes were the technical success of the procedure, efficacy, side effects, and the 30-day morbidity and mortality rates.
All embolizations were technically successful. The procedure efficacy was 90%; five patients (10%) had a recurrent hemorrhage requiring a secondary intervention. Side effects included hydrothorax (n=26, 52%), thrombocytosis (n=16, 32%), thrombocytopenia (n=13, 26%), and postembolization syndrome (n=11, 22%). Splenic infarcts occurred in 13 patients (26%). The overall and procedure-specific 30-day morbidity rates were 38% (19/50) and 14% (splenoportal thrombosis, 3/50; encapsulated bacterial infection, 1/50; splenic abscess, 1/50; femoral hematoma requiring surgery, 1/50; hydrothorax requiring drainage, 1/50). The overall and procedure-specific 30-day mortality rates were 8% (4/50) and 0%. The multivariate analysis showed that advanced patient age (P = 0.037), postprocedure thrombocytopenia (P = 0.008), postprocedure hydrothorax (P = 0.009), and the need for a secondary intervention (P = 0.004) predicted the 30-day morbidity, while renal insufficiency (P < 0.0001), preprocedure hemodynamic instability (P = 0.044), and preprocedure leukocytosis (P < 0.0001) were prognostic factors for the 30-day mortality.
SAE was performed with high technical success and efficacy, but the outcomes showed nontrivial morbidity rates. Elderly patients with thrombocytopenia and hydrothorax after SAE, and patients who require secondary interventions, should be monitored for complications.
评估脾动脉栓塞术(SAE)的安全性、疗效和临床结果。
回顾性研究了 1998 年至 2011 年间进行的 50 例 SAE 患者(男:女,33:17;平均年龄 49 岁)。该程序的适应证包括动脉瘤或假性动脉瘤(n=15)、胃静脉曲张出血(n=15)、术前减少手术失血(n=9)或其他(n=11)。共有 22 例为择期手术,28 例为紧急或急诊手术。栓塞剂包括线圈(n=50)、明胶海绵(n=15)和颗粒(n=4)。测量的结果是手术的技术成功率、疗效、副作用以及 30 天的发病率和死亡率。
所有栓塞均技术上成功。手术疗效为 90%;五名患者(10%)出现再出血,需要二次介入。副作用包括胸腔积液(n=26,52%)、血小板增多症(n=16,32%)、血小板减少症(n=13,26%)和栓塞后综合征(n=11,22%)。13 名患者发生脾梗死(26%)。总体和手术特异性 30 天发病率分别为 38%(19/50)和 14%(脾门静脉血栓形成,3/50;包裹性细菌感染,1/50;脾脓肿,1/50;股血肿需手术,1/50;胸腔积液需引流,1/50)。总体和手术特异性 30 天死亡率分别为 8%(4/50)和 0%。多变量分析显示,患者年龄较大(P=0.037)、术后血小板减少症(P=0.008)、术后胸腔积液(P=0.009)和需要二次干预(P=0.004)预测 30 天发病率,而肾功能不全(P<0.0001)、术前血流动力学不稳定(P=0.044)和术前白细胞增多症(P<0.0001)是 30 天死亡率的预后因素。
SAE 技术成功率和疗效均较高,但结果显示发病率较高。SAE 后血小板减少症和胸腔积液的老年患者以及需要二次干预的患者应监测并发症。