Residual Splenic Volume after Main Splenic Artery Embolization is Independent of the Underlying Disease.

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of main splenic artery embolization. To assess the potential difference post-embolization of the residual splenic volume in patients embolized for trauma versus those embolized for (pseudo)aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on a cohort of 65 patients (36 males) who underwent pre- and post-embolization computed tomography. Patients' demographics, pre- and post-interventional medical and radiological data were gathered. Splenic volume calculations were semi-automatically performed via a workstation. Patients with splenic aneurysms or pseudoaneurysms of the main splenic artery (group 1) were compared to those with splenic rupture (group 2) using Wilcoxon rank tests.

RESULTS

The main indications for splenic artery embolization were splenic rupture (n = 22; 34%) and splenic pseudoaneurysm (n = 19; 29%). The technical success rate was n = 63; 97%. The procedure-related complication rate was n = 7; 11%, including abscess formation (n = 5; 8%), re-bleeding (n = 1; 1.5 %) and pseudoaneurysm re-opening (n = 1; 1.5%). The overall 30-day mortality was n = 7; 11%.Median follow-up for groups 1 and 2 was 1163 days (61-3946 days) and 702 days (43-2095 days) respectively. When processable (n = 23), the splenic volume in group 1 (n = 7) was 311 cm and 257 cm (p = 0.1591) before and after embolization respectively, and in group 2 (n = 16) it was 261 cm and 215 cm (p = 0.4688), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Main splenic artery embolization is efficacious, with low procedure-related complication and 30-day mortality rates. No significant differences in residual post-embolization splenic volume were found between patients treated for splenic rupture versus those treated for splenic arterial (pseudo)aneurysm.