• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[《医学标准》第6.11条所涵盖的交通事故迟发后果的法医鉴定]

[Forensic medical expertise of delayed consequences of traffic accidents included in article 6.11 of the Medical Criteria].

作者信息

Gubaĭdullin M I

出版信息

Sud Med Ekspert. 2012 May-Jun;55(3):42-4.

PMID:22876650
Abstract

The medical documentation pertaining to 767 victims of traffic accidents was revised. These subjects were classified in the acute post-traumatic period as experiencing serious harm to health in terms of the qualifying sign "substantial persistent loss of at least of one third of general working ability" (SPLGWA) based on the results of primary examination. It was shown that in the course of therapeutic and rehabilitative treatment of the subjects with bone fractures listed in articles 6.11.1, 6.11.2, 6.11.4 to 6.11.10 of the Medical Criteria most of the patients have their compromised functions repaired up to complete recovery of the working ability. According to the repeated evaluation the substantial (35%) loss of the working ability persisted only in 25.8% of the victims. 56.7% of the victims were estimated to have lost 10-30% of their working ability; SPLGWA was absent in 17.5% of the examined subjects.

摘要

对767名交通事故受害者的医疗文件进行了修订。根据初次检查结果,这些受试者在创伤后急性期被归类为符合“至少三分之一的一般工作能力持续严重丧失”(SPLGWA)这一合格标志,健康受到严重损害。结果表明,在对《医疗标准》第6.11.1、6.11.2、6.11.4至6.11.10条所列骨折患者进行治疗和康复治疗的过程中,大多数患者受损功能得到修复,直至工作能力完全恢复。根据重复评估,仅25.8%的受害者仍存在严重(35%)的工作能力丧失。估计56.7%的受害者工作能力丧失了10%至30%;17.5%的受检者不存在SPLGWA。

相似文献

1
[Forensic medical expertise of delayed consequences of traffic accidents included in article 6.11 of the Medical Criteria].[《医学标准》第6.11条所涵盖的交通事故迟发后果的法医鉴定]
Sud Med Ekspert. 2012 May-Jun;55(3):42-4.
2
[The data on statistical surveillance of recording forensic medical expertises of the harm to human health collected by the Bureau of Forensic Medical Expertise (BFME) in Central Health Department of the Moscow region].
Sud Med Ekspert. 2011 Nov-Dec;54(6):32-7.
3
[The bounds of contents and admissibility of interpretations of practical text-based definitions of the medical criteria for the harm to health].
Sud Med Ekspert. 2012 Sep-Oct;55(5):49-52.
4
[Peculiar approaches to the estimation of the severity of harm to health in children with non-fatal injuries].
Sud Med Ekspert. 2011 Sep-Oct;54(5):50-3.
5
[On the forensic medical estimation of the harm to health in the case of the ankle joint injury].[关于踝关节损伤案件中健康损害的法医学评定]
Sud Med Ekspert. 2012 Jul-Aug;55(4):14-7.
6
[Errors made by experts when implementing the Medical Criteria for the estimation of the severity of harm to human health].
Sud Med Ekspert. 2012 Nov-Dec;55(6):46-50.
7
[The application of the medical criteria for the harm to health: expert and law-enforcement practice].[健康损害医学标准的应用:专家与执法实践]
Sud Med Ekspert. 2011 Sep-Oct;54(5):41-9.
8
[Basic approaches to medical, forensic, and biomechanical studies in expert evaluation of a car injury].[汽车损伤专家评估中医学、法医学及生物力学研究的基本方法]
Sud Med Ekspert. 2002 May-Jun;45(3):10-2.
9
[The problems of the forensic medical expertise of the degree of the severity of bodily injuries].
Sud Med Ekspert. 1991 Jul-Sep;34(3):41-5.
10
[Peculiar approaches to the estimation of the severity of harm to health in children with craniocerebral injuries].[评估颅脑损伤患儿健康损害严重程度的特殊方法]
Sud Med Ekspert. 2012 Sep-Oct;55(5):53-5.