Suppr超能文献

重症烧伤患者在接受或未接受持续肾脏替代治疗时,通过持续或间歇输注所产生的血清万古霉素水平。

Serum vancomycin levels resulting from continuous or intermittent infusion in critically ill burn patients with or without continuous renal replacement therapy.

作者信息

Akers Kevin S, Cota Jason M, Chung Kevin K, Renz Evan M, Mende Katrin, Murray Clinton K

机构信息

Infectious Disease Service, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):e254-62. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31825042fa.

Abstract

We evaluated vancomycin levels as recent guidelines for therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin (not available at the time these data were collected) recommend trough levels of 15 to 20 μg/mL; however, this may be more difficult to achieve in patients with accelerated vancomycin clearance, such as burn patients or recipients of continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) therapy. We retrospectively studied 2110 serum vancomycin levels of 171 patients admitted to the burn intensive care unit for more than 4 years and who received vancomycin by continuous infusion (CI) or intermittent infusion (II), with or without simultaneous CVVH. In-hospital mortality, 14- and 28-day mortality following vancomycin therapy were not different between dosing methods, although increased mortality was observed in the subgroup of patients receiving CI vancomycin empirically for clinical sepsis with negative blood cultures. More vancomycin was delivered to patients daily by CI than II, and therapeutic drug monitoring costs were similar. After controlling for differences in vancomycin dose by case matching with propensity scores, mean vancomycin levels were 20.0 ± 3.8 μg/mL for CI, vs 14.8 ± 4.4 μg/mL for II (P < .001). CI dosing resulted in similar levels with or without CVVH, whereas in II dosing, CVVH appeared to significantly decrease vancomycin levels. Although CI dosing was associated with higher vancomycin levels in general and fewer levels of <10 μg/mL, significant nephrotoxicity or neutropenia was not observed. Fifty-seven patients (33.3%) developed bacteremia, and 106 Gram-positive bacteria were recovered, including 63 Staphylococcus aureus. Recurrent bacteremia while receiving vancomycin was infrequent. The 90th percentile minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC₉₀) for vancomycin of 36 available S. aureus isolates tested by broth microdilution was 1.5 μg/mL. CI produced more frequent therapeutic vancomycin levels and less frequent subtherapeutic levels compared to II. However, therapeutic vancomycin levels were achieved infrequently by either method of dosing. Given equivalent therapeutic drug monitoring costs and the lack of a clear clinical benefit, the role of CI dosing remains to be defined in spite of practical and theoretical advantages, particularly when administered in the setting of CVVH.

摘要

我们评估了万古霉素水平,因为近期关于万古霉素治疗监测的指南(在收集这些数据时尚未出台)建议谷浓度为15至20μg/mL;然而,对于万古霉素清除加速的患者,如烧伤患者或接受持续静静脉血液滤过(CVVH)治疗的患者,这可能更难实现。我们回顾性研究了171例入住烧伤重症监护病房超过4年且接受万古霉素持续输注(CI)或间歇输注(II)(无论是否同时进行CVVH)的患者的2110次血清万古霉素水平。尽管在经验性接受CI万古霉素治疗且血培养阴性的临床脓毒症患者亚组中观察到死亡率增加,但不同给药方法之间的院内死亡率、万古霉素治疗后的14天和28天死亡率并无差异。CI组患者每日接受的万古霉素剂量比II组多,且治疗药物监测成本相似。通过倾向得分病例匹配控制万古霉素剂量差异后,CI组的平均万古霉素水平为20.0±3.8μg/mL,而II组为14.8±4.4μg/mL(P<0.001)。无论是否进行CVVH,CI给药导致的水平相似,而在II给药中,CVVH似乎显著降低了万古霉素水平。尽管CI给药总体上与较高的万古霉素水平相关且<10μg/mL的水平较少,但未观察到明显的肾毒性或中性粒细胞减少。57例患者(33.3%)发生菌血症,分离出106株革兰氏阳性菌,其中包括63株金黄色葡萄球菌。接受万古霉素治疗期间复发性菌血症并不常见。通过肉汤微量稀释法检测的36株可用金黄色葡萄球菌分离株的万古霉素第90百分位最低抑菌浓度(MIC₉₀)为1.5μg/mL。与II相比,CI产生的治疗性万古霉素水平更频繁,亚治疗水平更不频繁。然而,两种给药方法都很少能达到治疗性万古霉素水平。鉴于治疗药物监测成本相当且缺乏明确的临床益处,尽管CI给药具有实际和理论优势,尤其是在CVVH情况下给药时,但其作用仍有待确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验