• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺分配评分实施前后肺移植机会获取的地理差异。

Geographic disparities in access to lung transplantation before and after implementation of the lung allocation score.

机构信息

Service de Pneumologie B et Transplantation Pulmonaire, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2012 Nov;12(11):3085-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04202.x. Epub 2012 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04202.x
PMID:22883156
Abstract

The 62 lung transplant centers in the United States are unevenly distributed. We examined whether remote dwelling (distance from one's primary residence to the nearest lung transplant center) or rural dwelling (as opposed to urban) influences patients' access to lung transplantation, and whether such relationships changed following introduction of the lung allocation score (LAS) in May 2005. Between July 2001 and February 2009, 14 015 patients were listed for lung transplantation and 7923 (56.5%) were transplanted. Americans lived a median of 90.3 miles (IQR: 45.3-159.4) from the closest transplant center. Distance from a lung transplant center was inversely associated with the hazard of being listed before LAS implementation (adjusted HR for 100 miles = 0.87 [0.83-0.90]) and afterward (0.81 [0.78-0.85]); LAS implementation did not modify this relationship (p = 0.38). Once waitlisted, distance from the closest center was not associated with time to transplantation, and among those transplanted, distance was not associated with survival. Similar results were identified for rural, as opposed to urban, residence. We conclude that geographic disparaties exist in access to lung transplantation in the United States. These are mediated by listing practices rather than by transplantation rates, and were not mitigated by LAS implementation.

摘要

美国的 62 个肺移植中心分布不均。我们研究了居住地点偏远(距离患者常住地到最近的肺移植中心的距离)或居住在农村(与城市相对)是否会影响患者接受肺移植的机会,以及在 2005 年 5 月引入肺分配评分(LAS)后,这些关系是否发生了变化。2001 年 7 月至 2009 年 2 月,共有 14015 名患者接受了肺移植登记,其中 7923 名(56.5%)接受了肺移植。美国人距离最近的移植中心的中位数距离为 90.3 英里(IQR:45.3-159.4)。距离肺移植中心的距离与 LAS 实施前(调整后的 HR 为 100 英里=0.87[0.83-0.90])和之后(0.81[0.78-0.85])被列入名单的风险呈反比;LAS 的实施并没有改变这种关系(p=0.38)。一旦被列入等待名单,距离最近的中心与移植时间无关,而在接受移植的患者中,距离与存活率无关。农村与城市的居住情况也有类似的结果。我们的结论是,美国的肺移植机会存在地域差异。这些差异是通过列入名单的做法而不是通过移植率来调节的,并且 LAS 的实施并没有减轻这些差异。

相似文献

1
Geographic disparities in access to lung transplantation before and after implementation of the lung allocation score.肺分配评分实施前后肺移植机会获取的地理差异。
Am J Transplant. 2012 Nov;12(11):3085-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04202.x. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
2
Access to kidney transplantation among remote- and rural-dwelling patients with kidney failure in the United States.美国偏远和农村地区肾衰竭患者获得肾脏移植的情况。
JAMA. 2009 Apr 22;301(16):1681-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.545.
3
Rates of solid-organ wait-listing, transplantation, and survival among residents of rural and urban areas.农村和城市地区居民的实体器官等待名单登记率、移植率和生存率。
JAMA. 2008 Jan 9;299(2):202-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2007.50.
4
Disparities in lung transplantation before and after introduction of the lung allocation score.肺分配评分引入前后肺移植的差异。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Jul;32(7):684-92. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
5
Improved waitlist and transplant outcomes for pediatric lung transplantation after implementation of the lung allocation score.实施肺分配评分后,小儿肺移植的等待名单和移植结果得到改善。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 May;36(5):520-528. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
6
Impact of the lung allocation score on lung transplantation for pulmonary arterial hypertension.肺分配评分对肺动脉高压患者肺移植的影响。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep 1;180(5):468-74. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200810-1603OC. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
7
Access to Lung Transplantation in the United States: The Potential Impact of Access to a High-volume Center.美国的肺移植途径:进入高容量中心的潜在影响。
Transplantation. 2020 Jul;104(7):e199-e207. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003259.
8
Influence of broader geographic allograft sharing on outcomes and cost in smaller lung transplant centers.更广泛的地理供体共享对较小肺移植中心的结果和成本的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jan;163(1):339-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.09.008. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
9
Association of distance from a transplant center with access to waitlist placement, receipt of liver transplantation, and survival among US veterans.美国退伍军人中,与移植中心的距离与获得候补名单安置、接受肝移植和生存的关系。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 26;311(12):1234-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2520.
10
Geographic disparities in lung transplant rates.肺移植率的地域差异。
Am J Transplant. 2019 May;19(5):1491-1497. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15182. Epub 2018 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Mitigating Health Disparities in Transplantation Requires Equity, Not Equality.减轻移植中的健康不平等需要公平,而不是平等。
Transplantation. 2024 Jan 1;108(1):100-114. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004630. Epub 2023 May 5.
2
Lung Transplantation Outcomes in Recipients Aged 70 Years or Older and the Impact of Center Volume.70岁及以上受者的肺移植结果及中心手术量的影响。
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 18;12(16):5372. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165372.
3
What's to Lose When We Choose: Decision-making in Lung Transplantation.当我们做出选择时会失去什么:肺移植中的决策制定
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Feb;20(2):200-201. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202211-962ED.
4
A Conceptual Model for Sources of Differential Selection in Lung Transplant Allocation.肺移植分配中差异选择来源的概念模型。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Feb;20(2):226-235. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202202-105OC.
5
Disparities in Lung Transplant among Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Analysis of the IPF-PRO Registry.特发性肺纤维化患者肺移植中的差异:IPF-PRO 注册分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Jun;19(6):981-990. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202105-589OC.
6
Dynamic logistic state space prediction model for clinical decision making.动态逻辑状态空间预测模型用于临床决策。
Biometrics. 2023 Mar;79(1):73-85. doi: 10.1111/biom.13593. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
7
Mitigating selection bias in organ allocation models.减轻器官分配模型中的选择偏差。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Sep 21;21(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01379-7.
8
Access to Lung Transplantation in the United States: The Potential Impact of Access to a High-volume Center.美国的肺移植途径:进入高容量中心的潜在影响。
Transplantation. 2020 Jul;104(7):e199-e207. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003259.
9
Patient Travel Distance and Post Lung Transplant Survival in the United States: A Cohort Study.美国的患者旅行距离与肺移植术后生存:一项队列研究。
Transplantation. 2020 Nov;104(11):2365-2372. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003129.
10
Access to Transplant Care and Services Within the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局内的移植护理与服务获取情况。
Fed Pract. 2018 Aug;35(8):12-21.