Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Resuscitation. 2013 Mar;84(3):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.07.028. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
This is the first study to identify the factors associated with hyperventilation during actual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the emergency department (ED).
All CPR events in the ED were recorded by video from April 2011 to December 2011. The following variables were analysed using review of the recorded CPR data: ventilation rate (VR) during each minute and its associated factors including provider factors (experience, advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) certification), clinical factors (auscultation to confirm successful intubation, suctioning, and comments by the team leader) and time factors (time or day of CPR).
Fifty-five adult CPR cases including a total of 673 min sectors were analysed. The higher rates of hyperventilation (VR>10/min) were delivered by inexperienced (53.3% versus 14.2%) or uncertified ACLS provider (52.2% versus 10.8%), during night time (61.0 versus 34.5%) or weekend CPR (53.1% versus 35.6%) and when auscultation to confirm successful intubation was performed (93.5% versus 52.8%) than not (all p<0.0001). However, experienced (25.3% versus 29.7%; p=0.448) or certified ACLS provider (20.6% versus 31.3%; p<0.0001) could not deliver high rate of proper ventilation (VR 8-10/min). Comment by the team leader was most strongly associated with the proper ventilation (odds ratio 7.035, 95% confidence interval 4.512-10.967).
Hyperventilation during CPR was associated with inexperienced or uncertified ACLS provider, auscultation to confirm intubation, and night time or weekend CPR. And to deliver proper ventilation, comments by the team leader should be given regardless of providers' expert level.
这是第一项研究,旨在确定急诊科(ED)实际心肺复苏(CPR)过程中与过度通气相关的因素。
从 2011 年 4 月至 2011 年 12 月,通过视频记录了 ED 中的所有 CPR 事件。使用记录的 CPR 数据回顾分析了以下变量:每分钟的通气率(VR)及其相关因素,包括提供者因素(经验、高级心血管生命支持(ACLS)认证)、临床因素(听诊以确认成功插管、吸引和团队负责人的评论)和时间因素(CPR 的时间或日期)。
分析了 55 例成人 CPR 病例,共包括 673 分钟的时间段。不熟练(53.3% 比 14.2%)或未获得 ACLS 认证的提供者(52.2% 比 10.8%)、夜间(61.0% 比 34.5%)或周末 CPR(53.1% 比 35.6%)时,过度通气(VR>10/min)的发生率较高,且听诊以确认成功插管(93.5% 比 52.8%)比不听诊(均 p<0.0001)。然而,经验丰富(25.3% 比 29.7%;p=0.448)或获得 ACLS 认证的提供者(20.6% 比 31.3%;p<0.0001)并不能提供适当的通气率(VR 8-10/min)。团队负责人的评论与适当的通气最密切相关(比值比 7.035,95%置信区间 4.512-10.967)。
CPR 过程中的过度通气与不熟练或未获得 ACLS 认证的提供者、听诊以确认插管以及夜间或周末 CPR 有关。为了提供适当的通气,无论提供者的专业水平如何,都应给予团队负责人的评论。