Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Endoscopy, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1237-1243. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.07.113. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with acute liver failure (ALF) have high mortality and frequently require liver transplantation (LT); few reliable prognostic markers are available. Levels of M30, a cleavage product of cytokeratin-18 caspase, are significantly increased in serum samples from patients with ALF who die or undergo LT. We developed a prognostic index for ALF based on level of M30 and commonly measured clinical variables (called the Acute Liver Failure Study Group [ALFSG] index) and compared its accuracy with that of the King's College criteria (KCC) and Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD). We also validated our model in an independent group of patients with ALF.
Serum levels of M30 and M65 antigen (the total cytokeratin-18 fragment, a marker of apoptosis and necrosis) were measured on 3 of the first 4 days following admission of 250 patients with ALF. Logistic regression was used to determine whether the following factors, measured on day 1, were associated with LT or death: age, etiology; coma grade; international normalized ratio (INR); serum pH; body mass index; levels of creatinine, bilirubin, phosphorus, arterial ammonia, and lactate; and log(10) M30 and log(10) M65. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) was calculated for the ALFSG and other indices.
Coma grade, INR, levels of bilirubin and phosphorus, and log(10) M30 value at study entry most accurately identified patients who would require LT or die. The ALFSG index identified these patients with 85.6% sensitivity and 64.7% specificity. Based on comparison of AUROC values, the ALFSG Index (AUROC, 0.822) better identified patients most likely to require LT or die than the KCC (AUROC, 0.654) or MELD (AUROC, 0.704) (P = .0002 and P = .0010, respectively). We validated these findings in a separate group of 250 patients with ALF.
The ALFSG index, a combination of clinical markers and measurements of the apoptosis biomarker M30, better predicts outcomes of patients with ALF than the KCC or MELD.
急性肝衰竭(ALF)患者死亡率高,常需进行肝移植(LT);目前缺乏可靠的预后标志物。在死亡或接受 LT 的 ALF 患者的血清样本中,细胞角蛋白 18 半胱氨酸酶裂解产物 M30 的水平显著升高。我们基于 M30 水平和常用临床变量(称为急性肝衰竭研究组 [ALFSG] 指数)开发了一种用于 ALF 的预后指数,并将其准确性与 King's 学院标准(KCC)和终末期肝病模型(MELD)进行了比较。我们还在另一组 ALF 患者中验证了我们的模型。
在 250 名 ALF 患者入院后的前 4 天中的 3 天测量血清 M30 和 M65 抗原(总细胞角蛋白 18 片段,细胞凋亡和坏死的标志物)水平。使用逻辑回归确定在第 1 天测量的以下因素是否与 LT 或死亡相关:年龄、病因;昏迷程度;国际标准化比值(INR);血清 pH 值;体重指数;肌酐、胆红素、磷、动脉氨和乳酸水平;以及 log(10)M30 和 log(10)M65 值。计算 ALFSG 和其他指数的接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUROC)。
昏迷程度、INR、胆红素和磷水平以及研究开始时的 log(10)M30 值最准确地识别出需要 LT 或死亡的患者。ALFSG 指数以 85.6%的敏感性和 64.7%的特异性识别这些患者。基于 AUROC 值的比较,ALFSG 指数(AUROC,0.822)比 KCC(AUROC,0.654)或 MELD(AUROC,0.704)更好地识别出最有可能需要 LT 或死亡的患者(P =.0002 和 P =.0010)。我们在另一组 250 名 ALF 患者中验证了这些发现。
ALFSG 指数是一种结合了临床标志物和 M30 凋亡生物标志物测量的组合,比 KCC 或 MELD 更能预测 ALF 患者的结局。