Bode H J
Blutalkohol. 1990 Nov;27(6):417-26.
The author gives some further arguments for the truth of the critical review by Müller on the present legal situation of the medical-psychological examination of first-time drunken drivers by order (Blutalkohol 27, 116). He demands: Every person who applies for a driver's licence and whose former driving licence has been withdrawn should (after a screening of his person) be obliged to present a short expert opinion by a medical-psychological examination department, which gives hints on the further procedure before he is permitted to get a new driver's licence. The same procedure should be in force for persons who apply for a driver's licence on probation, if their former driving licence on probation has been withdrawn. Post-schooling, which is included in the law on driving licences, should not be carried through, if it is evidently hopeless. A certification on the participation in post-schooling course within the scope of the driver's licence on probation should not be given, if the aims of the course are evidently not within reach.
作者就米勒对首次因醉酒驾车被勒令进行医学-心理检查的当前法律状况的批判性评论的真实性给出了一些进一步的论据。他要求:每一位申请驾照且其先前驾照已被吊销的人(在对其本人进行筛查之后),应被要求提交一份由医学-心理检查部门出具的简短专家意见,该意见应就其在被允许获得新驾照之前的进一步程序给出提示。对于申请缓刑驾照且其先前的缓刑驾照已被吊销的人,同样的程序应生效。如果显然毫无希望,驾照法中包含的继续教育不应进行。如果课程目标显然无法实现,则不应出具关于参与缓刑驾照范围内继续教育课程的证明。