Cardiovascular Center, Department of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2012 Sep;90(9):1151-9. doi: 10.1139/y2012-033. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in both men and women in the developed countries. Despite this fact, females are still under-represented in the majority of clinical trials. At the present time, only limited evidence is available with respect to the female-specific aspects of pathogenesis, management, and outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Women less frequently undergo coronary intervention, and a lower proportion of women receive evidence-based pharmacotherapy, compared with men. It has been shown that women benefit from an invasive approach and coronary intervention in ACS as much as men, despite their advanced age and higher rate of bleeding complications. Also, administration of beta-blockers, ACE-inhibitors, and intensive statin therapy is associated with a comparable reduction of cardiovascular event rates in women and men. On the other hand, women may profit less than men from fibrinolytic or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy. Both sexes benefit equally from aspirin therapy, whereas contradictory data are available on the efficacy of clopidogrel in women. There is an urgent need for intensive research in the development of female-specific therapeutic strategy in ACS, even though the detailed mechanisms of sex differences are still unknown.
冠心病(CHD)是发达国家男性和女性发病率和死亡率的主要原因。尽管如此,在大多数临床试验中,女性的代表性仍然不足。目前,关于急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)发病机制、治疗和结局的女性特异性方面,仅有有限的证据。与男性相比,女性接受冠状动脉介入治疗的比例较低,接受基于证据的药物治疗的比例也较低。尽管女性年龄较大,出血并发症发生率较高,但研究表明,女性和男性一样,从 ACS 的介入治疗中获益。此外,β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和强化他汀类药物治疗与女性和男性心血管事件发生率的降低相当。另一方面,女性可能比男性从纤维蛋白溶解或糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂治疗中获益更少。两性都从阿司匹林治疗中受益,而氯吡格雷对女性的疗效存在相互矛盾的数据。尽管性别差异的详细机制尚不清楚,但仍迫切需要在 ACS 的女性特异性治疗策略的发展方面进行深入研究。