Côte d'Or Breast and Gynaecological Cancers Registry, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
BMC Cancer. 2012 Aug 13;12:351. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-351.
It has been shown in several studies that survival in cancer patients who were operated on by a high-volume surgeon was better. Why then do all patients not benefit from treatment by these experienced surgeons? The aim of our work was to study the hypothesis that in breast cancer, geographical isolation and the socio-economic level have an impact on the likelihood of being treated by a specialized breast-cancer surgeon.
All cases of primary invasive breast cancer diagnosed in the Côte d'Or from 1998 to 2008 were included. Individual clinical data and distance to the nearest reference care centre were collected. The Townsend Index of each residence area was calculated. A Log Rank test and a Cox model were used for survival analysis, and a multilevel logistic regression model was used to determine predictive factors of being treated or not by a specialized breast cancer surgeon.
Among our 3928 patients, the ten-year survival of the 2931 (74.6 %) patients operated on by a high-volume breast cancer surgeon was significantly better (LogRank p < 0.001), independently of age at diagnosis, the presence of at least one comorbidity, circumstances of diagnosis (screening or not) and TNM status (Cox HR = 0.81 [0.67-0.98]; p = 0.027). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, patients who lived 20 to 35 minutes, and more than 35 minutes away from the nearest reference care centre were less likely to be operated on by a specialized surgeon than were patients living less than 10 minutes away (OR = 0.56 [0.43; 0.73] and 0.38 [0.29; 0.50], respectively). This was also the case for patients living in rural areas compared with those living in urban areas (OR = 0.68 [0.53; 0.87]), and for patients living in the two most deprived areas (OR = 0.69 [0.48; 0.97] and 0.61 [0.44; 0.85] respectively) compared with those who lived in the most affluent area.
A disadvantageous socio-economic environment, a rural lifestyle and living far from large specialized treatment centres were significant independent predictors of not gaining access to surgeons specialized in breast cancer. Not being treated by a specialist surgeon implies a less favourable outcome in terms of survival.
多项研究表明,由高手术量外科医生进行手术的癌症患者的存活率更高。那么,为什么并非所有患者都能从这些经验丰富的外科医生的治疗中获益呢?我们的工作旨在研究这样一种假设,即在乳腺癌中,地理隔离和社会经济水平对患者接受专门的乳腺癌外科医生治疗的可能性有影响。
纳入 1998 年至 2008 年在科多尔地区诊断的所有原发性浸润性乳腺癌病例。收集了每位患者的个人临床数据和与最近的参考治疗中心的距离。计算了每个居住区域的汤森德指数。使用对数秩检验和 Cox 模型进行生存分析,使用多水平逻辑回归模型确定是否由专门的乳腺癌外科医生进行治疗的预测因素。
在我们的 3928 名患者中,由高手术量乳腺癌外科医生进行手术的 2931 名(74.6%)患者的十年生存率明显更好(对数秩检验 p<0.001),独立于诊断时的年龄、是否存在至少一种合并症、诊断情况(筛查或非筛查)和 TNM 状态(Cox HR=0.81[0.67-0.98];p=0.027)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,与居住在距离最近的参考治疗中心不到 10 分钟的患者相比,居住在距离最近的参考治疗中心 20-35 分钟和超过 35 分钟的患者由专门外科医生进行手术的可能性较低(OR=0.56[0.43;0.73]和 0.38[0.29;0.50])。与居住在城市地区的患者相比,居住在农村地区的患者也是如此(OR=0.68[0.53;0.87]),与居住在最贫困的两个地区的患者相比(OR=0.69[0.48;0.97]和 0.61[0.44;0.85])也是如此。
不利的社会经济环境、农村生活方式和远离大型专门治疗中心是无法获得专门从事乳腺癌治疗的外科医生治疗的显著独立预测因素。未接受专科医生治疗意味着生存方面的预后较差。