Downing A, Prakash K, Gilthorpe M S, Mikeljevic J S, Forman D
Cancer Epidemiology Group, Centre for Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Leeds, 30-32 Hyde Terrace, Leeds, UK.
Br J Cancer. 2007 Mar 12;96(5):836-40. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603622. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
In a large population-based series of invasive breast cancer patients, we investigated socioeconomic background (SEB) in relation to (a) stage at diagnosis; (b) treatment pattern; and (c) 5-year survival. Women diagnosed during 1998-2000 and resident in the Northern and Yorkshire regions of England were identified from the cancer registry database (N=12,768). Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to estimate associations between SEB (defined using the Townsend Index for area of residence) and tumour stage, treatment pattern, and survival. Living in a more deprived area was associated with increased likelihood of being diagnosed with stage III or IV disease (age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.18 per quartile increase in Townsend score), and, after adjustment for age and stage, reduced odds of having surgery (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.80-0.91), and receiving radiotherapy (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.88-0.94). Amongst patients receiving surgery, those living in more deprived areas had decreased odds of having breast conserving surgery (age plus stage-adjusted OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.89-0.95). Living in a more deprived area was also associated with increased mortality (age- plus stage-adjusted hazard ratio 1.08; 95% CI 1.05-1.11). These effects may operate through several pathways, such as later presentation leading to advanced disease.
在一系列基于大量人群的浸润性乳腺癌患者中,我们调查了社会经济背景(SEB)与以下因素的关系:(a)诊断时的分期;(b)治疗模式;以及(c)5年生存率。从癌症登记数据库中识别出1998年至2000年期间诊断且居住在英格兰北部和约克郡地区的女性(N = 12,768)。采用逻辑回归和Cox比例风险分析来估计SEB(使用居住地区的汤森指数定义)与肿瘤分期、治疗模式和生存率之间的关联。生活在更贫困地区与被诊断为III期或IV期疾病的可能性增加相关(年龄调整后的优势比(OR)为1.13;汤森得分每增加一个四分位数,95%置信区间(CI)为1.08 - 1.18),并且在调整年龄和分期后,进行手术的几率降低(OR 0.85;95% CI 0.80 - 0.91),接受放疗的几率也降低(OR 0.91;95% CI 0.88 - 0.94)。在接受手术的患者中,生活在更贫困地区的患者进行保乳手术的几率降低(年龄加分期调整后的OR 0.92;95% CI 0.89 - 0.95)。生活在更贫困地区还与死亡率增加相关(年龄加分期调整后的风险比1.08;95% CI 1.05 - 1.11)。这些影响可能通过多种途径起作用,例如就诊延迟导致疾病进展。