Suppr超能文献

MDRD(肾脏病饮食改良研究)方程和 CKD-EPI(慢性肾脏病流行病学合作)方程在估算老年人 GFR 中的准确性。

Accuracy of the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) study and CKD-EPI (CKD Epidemiology Collaboration) equations for estimation of GFR in the elderly.

机构信息

The Kent Kidney Care Centre, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Jan;61(1):57-66. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Aug 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function, commonly estimated using equations that adjust serum creatinine concentration for age, race, and sex. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation is widely used, but underestimates GFR at higher levels. The serum creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI(cr)) equation generally provides more accurate estimation at GFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Newer equations have been reported using cystatin C concentration either alone (CKD-EPI(cys)) or in combination with creatinine concentration (CKD-EPI(cr-cys)). None of these equations has been well validated in older people. We tested the accuracy of these equations in people 74 years or older compared with GFR measured by a reference method.

STUDY DESIGN

Diagnostic test evaluation in a prospective cohort.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n = 394; median age, 80 [range, 74-97] years) recruited from nephrology clinics and the community.

INDEX TEST

GFR estimated using the MDRD Study, CKD-EPI(cr), CKD-EPI(cys) and CKD-EPI(cr-cys) equations.

REFERENCE TEST

GFR measured using an iohexol clearance method.

RESULTS

Median measured GFR was 53.4 (range, 7.2-100.9) mL/min/1.73 m(2). MDRD Study-, CKD-EPI(cr)-, and CKD-EPI(cr-cys)-estimated GFRs overestimated GFR (median differences of 3.5 [P< 0.001], 1.7 [P < 0.001], and 0.8 [P = 0.02] mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively); the CKD-EPI(cys) equation was unbiased. Accuracy (percentage of estimates within 30% of measured GFR [P(30)]) was 81%, 83%, 86%, and 86% for the MDRD Study, CKD-EPI(cr), CKD-EPI(cys), and CKD-EPI(cr-cys) equations, respectively. Accuracy of the MDRD Study equation was inferior (P = 0.004) to the CKD-EPI(cr) equation at GFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m(2).

LIMITATIONS

Those of non-European ancestry were not included. For practical reasons, only a 4-hour sampling protocol was used for iohexol clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

The CKD-EPI(cr) equation appeared less biased and was more accurate than the MDRD Study equation. No equation achieved an ideal P(30) in the overall population. Our data suggest that GFR estimation is as satisfactory in older people of European ancestry as it has been reported to be in younger individuals.

摘要

背景

肾小球滤过率(GFR)是衡量肾脏功能的一项指标,通常使用基于血清肌酐浓度、并针对年龄、种族和性别进行调整的方程进行估算。MDRD 研究方程被广泛应用,但在 GFR 较高水平时会低估 GFR。基于血清肌酐的慢性肾脏病流行病学合作(CKD-EPI(cr))方程通常在 GFR>60 mL/min/1.73 m²时提供更准确的估算。目前已有报道使用胱抑素 C 浓度(CKD-EPI(cys))或与肌酐浓度联合(CKD-EPI(cr-cys))的新型方程进行估算。但这些方程在老年人中尚未得到充分验证。我们使用参考方法测量的 GFR 比较了这些方程在 74 岁及以上人群中的准确性。

研究设计

前瞻性队列中的诊断测试评估。

地点和参与者

从肾病诊所和社区招募的 394 名参与者(中位年龄 80 [范围 74-97] 岁)。

索引测试

使用 MDRD 研究、CKD-EPI(cr)、CKD-EPI(cys)和 CKD-EPI(cr-cys)方程估算 GFR。

参考测试

使用 iohexol 清除法测量 GFR。

结果

中位实测 GFR 为 53.4(范围 7.2-100.9)mL/min/1.73 m²。MDRD 研究、CKD-EPI(cr)和 CKD-EPI(cr-cys)估算的 GFR 均高估了 GFR(中位数差异分别为 3.5 [P<0.001]、1.7 [P < 0.001] 和 0.8 [P = 0.02] mL/min/1.73 m²);CKD-EPI(cys)方程无偏差。(估算值在实测 GFR 的 30%以内的百分比 [P(30)])分别为 81%、83%、86%和 86%。在 GFR>60 mL/min/1.73 m²时,MDRD 研究方程的准确性(P = 0.004)低于 CKD-EPI(cr)方程。

局限性

非欧洲血统的人未包括在内。出于实际原因,iohexol 清除仅使用 4 小时采样方案。

结论

与 MDRD 研究方程相比,CKD-EPI(cr)方程似乎偏差更小且更准确。没有一个方程在整个人群中达到理想的 P(30)。我们的数据表明,在欧洲裔老年人中,GFR 估计与在年轻个体中一样令人满意。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验