Suppr超能文献

与β-微量蛋白和β2-微球蛋白相比,联合使用胱抑素C和肌酐可更可靠地估算老年人的肾小球滤过率。

Combining Cystatin C and Creatinine Yields a Reliable Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation in Older Adults in Contrast to β-Trace Protein and β2-Microglobulin.

作者信息

Werner Karin, Pihlsgård Mats, Elmståhl Sölve, Legrand Helen, Nyman Ulf, Christensson Anders

机构信息

Department of Geriatrics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Nephron. 2017;137(1):29-37. doi: 10.1159/000473703. Epub 2017 Apr 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the most important measure of kidney function and chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aims to validate commonly used equations for estimated GFR (eGFR) based on creatinine (cr), cystatin C (cys), β-trace protein (BTP), and β2-microglobulin (B2M) in older adults.

METHOD

We conducted a validation study with 126 participants aged between 72 and 98 with a mean measured GFR (mGFR) by iohexol clearance of 54 mL/min/1.73 m2. The eGFR equations (CKD-Epidemiology collaboration [CKD-EPI], Berlin Initiative Study [BIS], Full Age Spectrum [FAS], Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD]cr, Caucasian-Asian-Pediatric-Adult [CAPA]cys, Lund-Malmö Revised [LM-REV]cr, and MEAN-LM-CAPAcr-cys), were assessed in terms of bias (median difference: eGFR-mGFR), precision (interquartile range of the differences), and accuracy (P30: percentage of estimates ±30% of mGFR). The equations were compared to a benchmark equation: CKD-EPIcr-cys.

RESULTS

All cystatin C-based equations underestimated the GFR compared to mGFR, whereas bias was mixed for the equations based only on creatinine. Accuracy was the highest for CKD-EPIcr-cys (98%) and lowest for MDRD (82%). Below mGFR 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 only equations incorporating cystatin C reached P30 accuracy >90%. CKD-EPIcr-cys was not significantly more accurate than the other cystatin C-based equations. In contrast, CKD-EPIcr-cys was significantly more accurate than all creatinine-based equations except LM-REVcr.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that it is reasonable to use equations incorporating cystatin C and creatinine in older patients across a wide spectrum of GFR. However, the results call into question the use of creatinine alone below mGFR 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. B2M and BTP do not demonstrate additional value in eGFR determination in older adults.

摘要

背景

肾小球滤过率(GFR)是衡量肾功能和慢性肾脏病(CKD)的最重要指标。本研究旨在验证基于肌酐(cr)、胱抑素C(cys)、β-微量蛋白(BTP)和β2-微球蛋白(B2M)的常用估算GFR(eGFR)方程在老年人中的适用性。

方法

我们对126名年龄在72至98岁之间的参与者进行了一项验证研究,通过碘海醇清除率测得的平均GFR(mGFR)为54 mL/min/1.73 m²。评估了eGFR方程(慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组[CKD-EPI]、柏林倡议研究[BIS]、全年龄谱[FAS]、肾脏病饮食改良[MDRD]cr、高加索-亚洲-儿童-成人[CAPA]cys、隆德-马尔默修订版[LM-REV]cr和均值-LM-CAPAcr-cys)的偏倚(中位数差异:eGFR - mGFR)、精密度(差异的四分位间距)和准确性(P30:估算值在mGFR±30%范围内的百分比)。将这些方程与一个基准方程:CKD-EPIcr-cys进行比较。

结果

与mGFR相比,所有基于胱抑素C的方程均低估了GFR,而仅基于肌酐的方程偏倚情况不一。CKD-EPIcr-cys的准确性最高(98%),MDRD的准确性最低(82%)。在mGFR低于45 mL/min/1.73 m²时,只有纳入胱抑素C的方程达到了P30准确性>90%。CKD-EPIcr-cys并不比其他基于胱抑素C的方程显著更准确。相比之下,CKD-EPIcr-cys比除LM-REVcr之外的所有基于肌酐的方程都显著更准确。

结论

本研究证实,在广泛的GFR范围内,在老年患者中使用纳入胱抑素C和肌酐的方程是合理的。然而,结果对在mGFR低于45 mL/min/1.73 m²时单独使用肌酐提出了质疑。B2M和BTP在老年人eGFR测定中未显示出额外价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验