Suppr超能文献

[妇科筛查还是宫颈癌筛查?临床观点与公共卫生观点之间的冲突]

[Gynecological screening or cervical screening? Conflicts between clinical and public health viewpoints].

作者信息

Döbrőssy Lajos, Kovács Attila, Budai András, Cornides Agnes

机构信息

Országos Tisztifőorvosi Hivatal Budapest Gyáli út 2-6.

出版信息

Orv Hetil. 2012 Aug 19;153(33):1302-13. doi: 10.1556/OH.2012.29432.

Abstract

The "gynecological screening" that is composed of complex gynecological examination including colposcopy and cytological examinations has traditionally been incorporated into the gynecological protocol and practice. Over the past few decades, unfortunately, this screening practice has entrenched in the mind both of the gynecological community and the general public. As a result, the government-supported, organized cervical screening program of the population has come to a standstill. In order to adjust the cervical screening practice to the international public health recommendations in which cytology is the only screening test applied, the authors decided to involve primary care nurses and health visitors in smear taking, and to refer those with abnormal findings to a gynecologist for further clinical examination.

摘要

由包括阴道镜检查和细胞学检查在内的复杂妇科检查组成的“妇科筛查”,传统上已纳入妇科诊疗方案和实践中。然而,在过去几十年里,这种筛查做法在妇科界和普通公众的观念中都已根深蒂固。结果,政府支持的、有组织的针对全体人群的宫颈癌筛查项目陷入了停滞。为了使宫颈癌筛查实践符合国际公共卫生建议(即细胞学是唯一应用的筛查检测方法),作者决定让初级保健护士和健康访视员参与涂片采集,并将检查结果异常者转诊给妇科医生进行进一步临床检查。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验