Department of Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Public Health, Hangzhou 310009, People's Republic of China.
Int J Cancer. 2013 Jan 15;132(2):E37-47. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27779. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
In the recent years, fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has emerged as a new modality for staging non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in detecting metastatic lesions in NSCLC patients. Meta-analysis methods were used to pool sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likehood ratios, diagnostic odd ratios and to construct a summary receiver-operating characteristic curve. Data from included studies were pooled to compare the diagnostic accuracy between PET/CT and PET or CT alone in nodal staging. Totally, 56 studies involving 8,699 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivities and specificities of (18)F-FDG PET/CT were 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-0.78] and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.94) in determining mediastinal nodal staging; 0.71 (95% CI: 0.60-0.80) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.88) in intrathoracic staging; 0.78 (95% CI: 0.64-0.87) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94) in intrathoracic staging on a per-node basis. For detecting extrathoracic metastases, the pooled sensitivities and specificities of (18)F-FDG PET/CT were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.47-0.93) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.97) for all extrathoracic metastases; 0.91 (95% CI: 0.80-0.97) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99) for bone metastases. (18)F-FDG PET/CT is beneficial in detecting lymph node metastases and extrathoracic metastases although PET/CT showed low sensitivity in detecting brain metastases. (18)F-FDG PET/CT confers significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than contrast-enhanced CT (both p < 0.01) and higher sensitivity than (18)F-FDG PET in staging NSCLC (p < 0.05).
近年来,氟 18 氟代脱氧葡萄糖(18)F-FDG 正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描(CT)已成为一种新的方法,用于分期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者。本荟萃分析旨在评估 18F-FDG PET/CT 在检测 NSCLC 患者转移病灶中的诊断价值。采用荟萃分析方法汇总灵敏度、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、诊断比值比,并构建汇总受试者工作特征曲线。对纳入研究的数据进行汇总,比较 PET/CT 与 PET 或 CT 单独在淋巴结分期中的诊断准确性。共有 56 项研究,涉及 8699 例患者,符合纳入标准。18F-FDG PET/CT 确定纵隔淋巴结分期的汇总灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.72(95%置信区间:0.65-0.78)和 0.91(95%置信区间:0.86-0.94);确定胸内分期的汇总灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.71(95%置信区间:0.60-0.80)和 0.83(95%置信区间:0.77-0.88);以每一个淋巴结为基础,确定胸内分期的汇总灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.78(95%置信区间:0.64-0.87)和 0.90(95%置信区间:0.84-0.94)。对于检测胸腔外转移,18F-FDG PET/CT 检测所有胸腔外转移的汇总灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.77(95%置信区间:0.47-0.93)和 0.95(95%置信区间:0.92-0.97);骨转移的汇总灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.91(95%置信区间:0.80-0.97)和 0.98(95%置信区间:0.94-0.99)。(18)F-FDG PET/CT 有助于检测淋巴结转移和胸腔外转移,尽管 PET/CT 对检测脑转移的敏感性较低。(18)F-FDG PET/CT 在分期 NSCLC 方面的灵敏度和特异性均显著高于增强 CT(均 p<0.01),且灵敏度高于 18F-FDG PET(p<0.05)。