Radiation dose reduction at multidetector CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for evaluation of urolithiasis: how low can we go?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the performance of computed tomographic (CT) examinations at 80 and 100 kV with tube current-time products of 75-150 mA and the effect of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on CT image quality in patients with urinary stone disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved study, verbal consent for prospective low-dose CT and waivers of consent for retrospective review of CT scans were obtained. Between November 2010 and April 2011, 25 patients (15 men, 10 women; mean age, 35 years) with urolithiasis underwent 64-section multidetector CT with 75-150 mA and noise index of 30. Modified protocol was based on body weight (<200 lb [90 kg], 80 kV; >200 lb [90 kg], 100 kV). Images of 5-mm section thickness were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and 60% and 80% ASIR techniques, with 3-mm coronal and sagittal reformations. Two readers independently reviewed FBP and ASIR data sets for image quality (scale, 1-5), noise (scale , 1-3), and calculi (number, size, location). Confidence levels for urolithiaisis and alternate diagnoses were rated (scale, 1-3). In 13 patients, FBP CT images acquired with the reference standard departmental protocol were available for comparison. Radiation dose was compared between imaging series. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon signed rank and paired t tests.

RESULTS

Modified-protocol FBP images showed low image quality (score, 2.5), with improvement on modified-protocol ASIR images (score, 3.4) (P=.03). All 33 stones (mean diameter, 6.1 mm; range, 2-28 mm) at modified-protocol CT were diagnosed by both readers. In 20 of 25 patients (80%), ASIR images were rated adequate for rendering other diagnoses in the abdomen (score, 2.0), as opposed to FBP images (score, 1.3). Mean radiation dose for modified-protocol CT was 1.8 mGy (1.3 mGy for patients<200 lb; 2.3 mGy for patients>200 lb) in comparison with 9.9 mGy for reference-protocol CT (P=.001).

CONCLUSION

Image quality improvements with ASIR at reduced radiation dose of 1.8 mGy enabled effective evaluation of urinary calculi without substantially affecting diagnostic confidence. © RSNA, 2012.