• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与行业合作伙伴开展儿科多中心随机对照试验:挑战与经验教训

Conducting a paediatric multi-centre RCT with an industry partner: challenges and lessons learned.

作者信息

Maskell Jessica, Newcombe Peter, Martin Graham, Kimble Roy

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

J Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Nov;48(11):974-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02510.x. Epub 2012 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02510.x
PMID:22892018
Abstract

There are many benefits of multi-centred research including large sample sizes, statistical power, timely recruitment and generalisability of results. However, there are numerous considerations when planning and implementing a multi-centred study. This article reviews the challenges and successes of planning and implementing a multi-centred prospective randomised control trial involving an industry partner. The research investigated the impact on psychosocial functioning of a cosmetic camouflage product for children and adolescents with burn scarring. Multi-centred studies commonly have many stakeholders. Within this study, six Australian and New Zealand paediatric burn units as well as an industry partner were involved. The inclusion of an industry partner added complexities as they brought different priorities and expectations to the research. Further, multifaceted ethical and institutional approval processes needed to be negotiated. The challenges, successes, lessons learned and recommendations from this study regarding Australian and New Zealand ethics and research governance approval processes, collaboration with industry partners and the management of differing expectations will be outlined. Recommendations for future multi-centred research with industry partners include provision of regular written reports for the industry partner; continual monitoring and prompt resolution of concerns; basic research practices education for industry partners; minimisation of industry partner contact with participants; clear roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders and utilisation of single ethical review if available.

摘要

多中心研究有诸多益处,包括大样本量、统计效能、及时招募以及结果的可推广性。然而,在规划和实施多中心研究时需要考虑众多因素。本文回顾了规划和实施一项涉及行业合作伙伴的多中心前瞻性随机对照试验的挑战与成功之处。该研究调查了一种用于有烧伤疤痕的儿童和青少年的美容遮瑕产品对心理社会功能的影响。多中心研究通常有许多利益相关者。在本研究中,涉及六个澳大利亚和新西兰的儿科烧伤病房以及一个行业合作伙伴。纳入一个行业合作伙伴增加了复杂性,因为他们给研究带来了不同的优先事项和期望。此外,需要协商多方面的伦理和机构审批程序。将概述本研究在澳大利亚和新西兰伦理及研究管理审批程序、与行业合作伙伴的合作以及不同期望的管理方面的挑战、成功经验、吸取的教训和建议。对未来与行业合作伙伴进行多中心研究的建议包括为行业合作伙伴提供定期书面报告;持续监测并迅速解决问题;为行业合作伙伴开展基础研究实践教育;尽量减少行业合作伙伴与参与者的接触;明确所有利益相关者的角色和责任以及若可行则采用单一伦理审查。

相似文献

1
Conducting a paediatric multi-centre RCT with an industry partner: challenges and lessons learned.与行业合作伙伴开展儿科多中心随机对照试验:挑战与经验教训
J Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Nov;48(11):974-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02510.x. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
2
Psychological and psychosocial functioning of children with burn scarring using cosmetic camouflage: a multi-centre prospective randomised controlled trial.使用美容遮瑕对烧伤瘢痕儿童心理和社会心理功能的影响:一项多中心前瞻性随机对照试验
Burns. 2014 Feb;40(1):135-49. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.04.025. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
3
Ethical issues: the multi-centre low-risk ethics/governance review process and AMOSS.伦理问题:多中心低风险伦理/治理审查流程与AMOSS
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Apr;52(2):195-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01390.x. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
4
Randomised controlled trials in overweight children: practicalities and realities.超重儿童的随机对照试验:实际情况与现实
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2007;2(2):73-85. doi: 10.1080/17477160601133671.
5
A guide to multi-centre ethics for surgical research in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰外科研究多中心伦理指南。
ANZ J Surg. 2011 Mar;81(3):132-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05529.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
6
Sharing of lessons learned from multisite research.多中心研究经验教训的分享。
Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010 Winter;22(4):408-16. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181faeb11.
7
Ethical dilemmas of a large national multi-centre study in Australia: time for some consistency.澳大利亚一项大型全国性多中心研究的伦理困境:是时候保持一些一致性了。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Aug;17(16):2212-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02219.x.
8
Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT): first steps towards the development of an Australian and New Zealand research network.国际急诊科儿科研究协作组(PREDICT):澳大利亚和新西兰研究网络发展的初步举措。
Emerg Med Australas. 2006 Apr;18(2):143-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00823.x.
9
Developing the first Bi-National clinical quality registry for burns--lessons learned so far.制定首个中澳双边烧伤临床质量登记研究——迄今的经验教训。
Burns. 2012 Feb;38(1):52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
10
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.

引用本文的文献

1
Research Ethics Challenges, Controversies and Difficulties in Intensive Care Units-A Systematic Review of Theoretical Concepts.重症监护病房中的研究伦理挑战、争议与困难——理论概念的系统综述
Nurs Rep. 2025 May 7;15(5):164. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15050164.
2
Implementing a self-management intervention for people with a chronic compensable musculoskeletal injury in a workers compensation context: a process evaluation.在工伤赔偿背景下,为患有慢性可补偿性肌肉骨骼损伤的人群实施自我管理干预措施:一项过程评估
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Jun;25(2):412-22. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9551-4.