• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进农民参与和活动,以控制奶牛跛行。

Promoting farmer engagement and activity in the control of dairy cattle lameness.

机构信息

University of Bristol, School of Veterinary Sciences, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.

出版信息

Vet J. 2012 Sep;193(3):617-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.041. Epub 2012 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.041
PMID:22892183
Abstract

Many 'influencers' allied to the agricultural industry support farmers to implement management changes that affect animal welfare. Developing approaches to working with farmers that achieve both engagement and subsequently management changes is critical. As an example, the generation of action points and implementation of change to control dairy cattle lameness is reported and discussed here. Action plans were generated on farms receiving both lameness monitoring and intervention support (MS group; n=117) as part of a 3 year intervention project. At the start of year 1, MS farmers received action planning advice from a veterinary surgeon, and then at the start of years 2 and 3, farmers generated their own lameness control action plans with facilitator support. Engagement was achieved with 114 MS farmers who generated 692 action points in total. Two hundred and sixteen of these resulted from veterinary advice and 476 were generated by the farmers with facilitator support. In terms of activity, MS farms implemented a mean of 8.22 changes per farm as compared to 6.77 on farms which only received annual lameness monitoring (MO group; n=72). While these levels of change were similar, fewer changes implemented on the MS farms (8.5%) were judged 'likely to increase the risk of lameness' compared to the MO farms (16.5%). Farmers generated substantial numbers of lameness control action points for their own farms aided by a facilitator and, crucially, veterinary or facilitator involvement reduced changes that were likely to compromise lameness control.

摘要

许多与农业产业结盟的“影响者”支持农民实施影响动物福利的管理变革。开发与农民合作的方法,实现参与和随后的管理变革至关重要。例如,这里报告和讨论了为控制奶牛跛行生成行动要点和实施变革的方法。在一个为期 3 年的干预项目中,在接受跛行监测和干预支持的农场(MS 组;n=117)上生成了行动计划。在第 1 年开始时,MS 农民从兽医那里获得了行动计划建议,然后在第 2 年和第 3 年开始时,农民在促进者的支持下生成了自己的跛行控制行动计划。有 114 名 MS 农民参与了这项计划,共生成了 692 个行动要点。其中 216 个来自兽医建议,476 个是由农民在促进者的支持下生成的。在活动方面,MS 农场平均每农场实施了 8.22 项变革,而仅接受年度跛行监测的农场(MO 组;n=72)为 6.77 项。虽然这些变革水平相似,但在 MS 农场实施的变革中(8.5%)被认为“可能增加跛行风险”的比例低于 MO 农场(16.5%)。在促进者的帮助下,农民为自己的农场生成了大量的跛行控制行动要点,重要的是,兽医或促进者的参与减少了可能损害跛行控制的变革。

相似文献

1
Promoting farmer engagement and activity in the control of dairy cattle lameness.促进农民参与和活动,以控制奶牛跛行。
Vet J. 2012 Sep;193(3):617-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.041. Epub 2012 Aug 12.
2
Evaluating an intervention to reduce lameness in dairy cattle.评估一项减少奶牛跛行的干预措施。
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jun;95(6):2946-54. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4678.
3
The development, implementation and testing of a lameness control programme based on HACCP principles and designed for heifers on dairy farms.基于危害分析与关键控制点(HACCP)原则并为奶牛场小母牛设计的跛足控制计划的制定、实施和测试。
Vet J. 2009 May;180(2):178-88. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.05.020. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
4
Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 1. Understanding barriers to lameness control on dairy farms.努力减少奶牛跛行:1. 了解奶牛场跛行控制的障碍。
Res Vet Sci. 2010 Oct;89(2):311-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.02.014. Epub 2010 Apr 3.
5
Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 2. Understanding dairy farmers' motivations.努力减少奶牛跛行:2. 了解奶农的动机。
Res Vet Sci. 2010 Oct;89(2):318-23. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.02.017. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
6
Promoting farm advisor engagement and action toward the improvement of dairy cattle lameness.促进农场顾问参与并采取行动改善奶牛跛行。
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Jul;105(7):6364-6377. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21745. Epub 2022 May 28.
7
The Relationship of Cow Comfort and Flooring to Lameness Disorders in Dairy Cattle.奶牛舒适度、牛舍地面与奶牛跛行疾病的关系
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2017 Jul;33(2):227-233. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
8
Can lameness prevalence in dairy herds be predicted from farmers' reports of their motivation to control lameness and barriers to doing so? An observational study from New Zealand.从农民报告控制跛行的动机和障碍方面能否预测奶牛跛行的流行程度?来自新西兰的观察性研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Apr;107(4):2332-2345. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23862. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
9
Lameness prevalence and risk factors in organic and non-organic dairy herds in the United Kingdom.英国有机和非有机奶牛场的跛足发生率及风险因素
Vet J. 2009 Apr;180(1):95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.03.015. Epub 2008 May 6.
10
Reducing lameness in dairy herds--overcoming some barriers.减少奶牛跛行——克服一些障碍。
Res Vet Sci. 2013 Jun;94(3):820-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a scheme to identify risks for tail biting in pigs.评估一种用于识别猪咬尾风险的方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 29;19(8):e0305960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305960. eCollection 2024.
2
Interspecies encounters with endemic health conditions: co-producing BVD and lameness with cows and sheep in the north of England.与地方病健康状况的跨物种接触:在英格兰北部与奶牛和绵羊共同产生牛病毒性腹泻和跛足问题
Sociol Ruralis. 2024 Apr;64(2):180-201. doi: 10.1111/soru.12458. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
Changing interventions in farm animal health and welfare: A governmentality approach to the case of lameness.
农场动物健康与福利干预措施的转变:以跛足案例为例的治理视角
J Rural Stud. 2023 Jan;97:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.12.004.
4
Sheep farmers' attitudes towards lameness control: Qualitative exploration of factors affecting adoption of the lameness Five-Point Plan.绵羊养殖户对跛行控制的态度:采用跛行五点计划的影响因素的定性探讨。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 9;16(2):e0246798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246798. eCollection 2021.
5
The Importance of the Social Sciences in Reducing Tail Biting Prevalence in Pigs.社会科学在降低猪咬尾发生率方面的重要性。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Aug 21;9(9):591. doi: 10.3390/ani9090591.
6
The etiology of digital dermatitis in ruminants: recent perspectives.反刍动物蹄皮炎的病因:最新观点
Vet Med (Auckl). 2015 May 4;6:155-164. doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S62072. eCollection 2015.
7
Mutilating Procedures, Management Practices, and Housing Conditions That May Affect the Welfare of Farm Animals: Implications for Welfare Research.可能影响农场动物福利的致残性操作、管理措施及饲养条件:对福利研究的启示
Animals (Basel). 2017 Feb 21;7(2):12. doi: 10.3390/ani7020012.
8
Training veterinarians and agricultural advisers on a novel tool for tail biting prevention.就一种预防咬尾的新工具对兽医和农业顾问进行培训。
Vet Rec Open. 2015 Feb 7;2(1):e000083. doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2014-000083. eCollection 2015.