University of Bristol, School of Veterinary Sciences, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.
Vet J. 2012 Sep;193(3):617-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.041. Epub 2012 Aug 12.
Many 'influencers' allied to the agricultural industry support farmers to implement management changes that affect animal welfare. Developing approaches to working with farmers that achieve both engagement and subsequently management changes is critical. As an example, the generation of action points and implementation of change to control dairy cattle lameness is reported and discussed here. Action plans were generated on farms receiving both lameness monitoring and intervention support (MS group; n=117) as part of a 3 year intervention project. At the start of year 1, MS farmers received action planning advice from a veterinary surgeon, and then at the start of years 2 and 3, farmers generated their own lameness control action plans with facilitator support. Engagement was achieved with 114 MS farmers who generated 692 action points in total. Two hundred and sixteen of these resulted from veterinary advice and 476 were generated by the farmers with facilitator support. In terms of activity, MS farms implemented a mean of 8.22 changes per farm as compared to 6.77 on farms which only received annual lameness monitoring (MO group; n=72). While these levels of change were similar, fewer changes implemented on the MS farms (8.5%) were judged 'likely to increase the risk of lameness' compared to the MO farms (16.5%). Farmers generated substantial numbers of lameness control action points for their own farms aided by a facilitator and, crucially, veterinary or facilitator involvement reduced changes that were likely to compromise lameness control.
许多与农业产业结盟的“影响者”支持农民实施影响动物福利的管理变革。开发与农民合作的方法,实现参与和随后的管理变革至关重要。例如,这里报告和讨论了为控制奶牛跛行生成行动要点和实施变革的方法。在一个为期 3 年的干预项目中,在接受跛行监测和干预支持的农场(MS 组;n=117)上生成了行动计划。在第 1 年开始时,MS 农民从兽医那里获得了行动计划建议,然后在第 2 年和第 3 年开始时,农民在促进者的支持下生成了自己的跛行控制行动计划。有 114 名 MS 农民参与了这项计划,共生成了 692 个行动要点。其中 216 个来自兽医建议,476 个是由农民在促进者的支持下生成的。在活动方面,MS 农场平均每农场实施了 8.22 项变革,而仅接受年度跛行监测的农场(MO 组;n=72)为 6.77 项。虽然这些变革水平相似,但在 MS 农场实施的变革中(8.5%)被认为“可能增加跛行风险”的比例低于 MO 农场(16.5%)。在促进者的帮助下,农民为自己的农场生成了大量的跛行控制行动要点,重要的是,兽医或促进者的参与减少了可能损害跛行控制的变革。