Roigt Delphine
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, CHUM-Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, QC, Canada.
HEC Forum. 2012 Sep;24(3):179-86. doi: 10.1007/s10730-012-9185-x.
For quite some time now, there have been discussions and debates in North America in the field of ethics concerning professionalization. From a talk given to graduate and undergraduate university students, the author tells the personal journey of an ethicist in the province of Quebec, Canada, and offers a narrative to illustrate some of the issues she faced since starting her work in the field of ethics at the end of the 1990s. Instead of taking the usual "for" and "against" positions, the author addresses the issue of professionalization of healthcare ethics from her own point of view. Referring to her experience with ethics committees and research ethics boards and to the works of George A. Legault in Crise d'identité professionnelle et Professionnalisme (Presses de l'Université du Québec, Sainte-Foy, 2003), she pleads for the development of practice standards and the creation of a deliberative process (see Kirby and Simpson in this issue of HEC Forum 2012), a dialogical space for assuring professionalism in healthcare ethics interventions, not solely the act of becoming a profession.
在北美，伦理学界关于专业化的讨论和辩论已经持续了相当长一段时间。作者通过一场面向大学生和研究生的讲座，讲述了加拿大魁北克省一位伦理学家的个人经历，并给出了一个叙述，以说明自20世纪90年代末她开始从事伦理领域工作以来所面临的一些问题。作者没有采取常见的“支持”和“反对”立场，而是从自己的角度探讨了医疗伦理专业化的问题。她提及自己在伦理委员会和研究伦理委员会的经历，以及乔治·A·勒加尔特在《职业认同危机与专业精神》（魁北克大学出版社，圣福伊，2003年）中的著作，呼吁制定实践标准并创建一个审议过程（见本期《HEC论坛》2012年Kirby和Simpson的文章），即一个对话空间，以确保医疗伦理干预中的专业性，而不仅仅是成为一个专业的行为。
