Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
Dysphagia. 2013 Jun;28(2):123-30. doi: 10.1007/s00455-012-9420-2. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
The purpose of this investigation was to perform a comprehensive bibliometric review of published abstracts presented at the Dysphagia Research Society between 2001 and 2011 in order to delineate research trends, identify knowledge gaps, and recommend areas for future dysphagia research. All 972 research abstracts, both oral and poster presentations, were included. Study designs included cross-sectional (n = 333, 34.4 %), cohort (n = 279, 28.8 %), and case series (n = 210, 21.7 %), while randomized controlled trials constituted only 3.3 % (n = 32) of all research presentations. Levels of evidence were assigned based on analysis of abstract details, as level 1 (n = 29, 3.0 %), level 2 (n = 639, 65.7 %), level 3 (n = 53, 5.5 %), level 4 (n = 243, 25.0 %), and level 5 (n = 8, 0.8 %). Research topics included normal swallowing pathophysiology (n = 279, 28.7 %), swallowing physiology (n = 266, 27.4 %), swallowing diagnosis (n = 192, 19.7 %), swallowing treatment (n = 165, 17.0 %), clinical policy and practice (n = 36, 3.7 %), and basic science (n = 34, 3.5 %). Research occurred in adults (n = 861, 88.6 %), pediatrics (n = 76, 7.8 %), animals (n = 29, 3.0 %), cadavers (n = 3, 0.3 %), and mechanical models (n = 3, 0.3 %). Presenting authors represented 14 different disciplines, with the majority in speech-language pathology, dentistry, basic science, and otolaryngology. Research was performed in 14 different countries with increased geographical diversity during the decade of analysis. Research recommendations derived from our findings call for increased (1) randomized controlled clinical trials consistent with level 1 evidence, (2) focus on pediatric feeding and swallowing, (3) use of animal models to study swallowing dysfunction and novel treatments, and (4) investigations from additional medical specialties. In addition, we applaud current trends and encourage continued support of interdisciplinary, international, and trainee representation.
本研究旨在对 2001 年至 2011 年期间在吞咽研究学会(Dysphagia Research Society)发表的摘要进行全面的文献计量学综述,以描绘研究趋势、确定知识空白,并为未来的吞咽研究推荐领域。所有 972 篇研究摘要,包括口头和海报展示,均被纳入研究。研究设计包括横断面研究(n=333,34.4%)、队列研究(n=279,28.8%)和病例系列研究(n=210,21.7%),而随机对照试验仅占所有研究报告的 3.3%(n=32)。证据水平根据摘要细节的分析确定,其中 1 级(n=29,3.0%)、2 级(n=639,65.7%)、3 级(n=53,5.5%)、4 级(n=243,25.0%)和 5 级(n=8,0.8%)。研究主题包括正常吞咽生理学(n=279,28.7%)、吞咽生理学(n=266,27.4%)、吞咽诊断(n=192,19.7%)、吞咽治疗(n=165,17.0%)、临床政策和实践(n=36,3.7%)和基础科学(n=34,3.5%)。研究对象包括成人(n=861,88.6%)、儿科(n=76,7.8%)、动物(n=29,3.0%)、尸体(n=3,0.3%)和机械模型(n=3,0.3%)。报告作者代表了 14 个不同的学科,其中大多数来自言语语言病理学、牙科、基础科学和耳鼻喉科。该研究在 14 个不同的国家进行,在分析的十年间,地理多样性有所增加。研究建议源自我们的发现,呼吁增加(1)与 1 级证据一致的随机对照临床试验,(2)关注儿科喂养和吞咽问题,(3)使用动物模型研究吞咽功能障碍和新疗法,以及(4)来自其他医学专业的研究。此外,我们赞赏当前的趋势,并鼓励继续支持跨学科、国际和学员的代表性。