Department of Signal Processing and Acoustics, Aalto University, PO Box 13000, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):848-61. doi: 10.1121/1.4730882.
Artificial bandwidth extension methods have been developed to improve the quality and intelligibility of narrowband telephone speech and to reduce the difference with wideband speech. Such methods have commonly been evaluated with objective measures or subjective listening-only tests, but conversational evaluations have been rare. This article presents a conversational evaluation of two methods for the artificial bandwidth extension of telephone speech. Bandwidth-extended narrowband speech is compared with narrowband and wideband speech in a test setting including a simulated telephone connection, realistic conversation tasks, and various background noise conditions. The responses of the subjects indicate that speech processed with one of the methods is preferred to narrowband speech in noise, but wideband speech is superior to both narrowband and bandwidth-extended speech. Bandwidth extension was found to be beneficial for telephone conversation in noisy listening conditions.
人工带宽扩展方法已经被开发出来,以提高窄带电话语音的质量和可懂度,并减少与宽带语音的差异。这些方法通常使用客观的度量标准或主观的仅听测试来评估,但对话评估却很少见。本文对两种人工带宽扩展电话语音的方法进行了对话评估。在包括模拟电话连接、真实对话任务和各种背景噪声条件的测试设置中,将扩展带宽后的窄带语音与窄带和宽带语音进行了比较。被试的反应表明,在噪声环境下,一种方法处理后的语音比窄带语音更受欢迎,但宽带语音优于窄带和带宽扩展后的语音。带宽扩展被发现有利于在嘈杂的听力条件下进行电话通话。