• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动注意偏差的可塑:特征特异性注意分配的影响。

On the malleability of automatic attentional biases: effects of feature-specific attention allocation.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Cogn Emot. 2013;27(3):385-400. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.712949. Epub 2012 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1080/02699931.2012.712949
PMID:22894752
Abstract

In two experiments, we examined the extent to which automatic attentional biases, as indexed by performance in the emotional Stroop task (Experiment 1) and the dot-probe task (Experiment 2), are modulated by feature-specific attention allocation. In both experiments, participants were encouraged to attend to either affective stimulus information (affective groups) or non-affective semantic stimulus information (non-affective groups). In both experiments, an attentional bias towards negative stimuli was found in the affective groups but not in the non-affective groups. In Experiment 1, we also observed an attentional bias towards non-affective semantic stimulus information in the non-affective group but not in the affective groups. We argue that these effects are due to a modulation of automatic stimulus processing by feature-specific attention allocation. Our data demonstrate that automatic attentional biases toward negative stimuli are not unconditional but instead depend on the relevance of negative information. Moreover, the results of Experiment 1 suggest that attention is automatically biased towards non-affective stimulus dimensions that are currently relevant.

摘要

在两项实验中,我们考察了自动注意偏向(以情绪斯特鲁普任务[实验 1]和点探测任务[实验 2]中的表现为指标)在多大程度上受到特征特异性注意分配的调节。在这两个实验中,参与者被鼓励关注情感刺激信息(情感组)或非情感语义刺激信息(非情感组)。在两个实验中,情感组中都发现了对负性刺激的注意偏向,但非情感组中没有。在实验 1 中,我们还观察到非情感组中对非情感语义刺激信息的注意偏向,但在情感组中没有。我们认为这些效应是由于特征特异性注意分配对自动刺激处理的调节。我们的数据表明,对负性刺激的自动注意偏向不是无条件的,而是取决于负性信息的相关性。此外,实验 1 的结果表明,注意力会自动偏向当前相关的非情感刺激维度。

相似文献

1
On the malleability of automatic attentional biases: effects of feature-specific attention allocation.自动注意偏差的可塑:特征特异性注意分配的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2013;27(3):385-400. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.712949. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
2
Is emotional Stroop interference linked to affective responses? Evidence from skin conductance and facial electromyography.情绪 Stroop 干扰与情感反应有关吗?来自皮肤电传导和面部肌电图的证据。
Emotion. 2013 Feb;13(1):129-38. doi: 10.1037/a0029520. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
3
Attentional bias for smoking and affective stimuli: a Stroop task study.对吸烟及情感刺激的注意偏向:一项斯特鲁普任务研究。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2006 Dec;20(4):490-5. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.20.4.490.
4
Unconscious semantic activation depends on feature-specific attention allocation.无意识语义激活依赖于特征特定的注意力分配。
Cognition. 2012 Jan;122(1):91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.017. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
5
Why does a red snake in the grass capture your attention?为什么草丛中的一条红蛇会引起你的注意?
Emotion. 2011 Apr;11(2):224-32. doi: 10.1037/a0022578.
6
Do the affective properties of smoking-related cues influence attentional and approach biases in cigarette smokers?与吸烟相关线索的情感属性是否会影响吸烟者的注意力和趋近偏向?
J Psychopharmacol. 2008 Sep;22(7):737-45. doi: 10.1177/0269881107083844. Epub 2008 Jan 21.
7
Attentional processes and responding to affective faces in youth with borderline personality features.注意过程与边缘型人格特质青少年对情感面孔的反应。
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Aug 30;199(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.03.027. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
8
A meta-analysis of the magnitude of biased attention in depression.抑郁中偏倚注意程度的荟萃分析。
Depress Anxiety. 2010 Dec;27(12):1135-42. doi: 10.1002/da.20755.
9
Counter-regulation triggered by emotions: positive/negative affective states elicit opposite valence biases in affective processing.情绪引发的反向调节:积极/消极的情绪状态会在情绪处理中引发相反的效价偏差。
Cogn Emot. 2013;27(5):839-55. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.750599. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
10
Different stages in attentional processing of facial expressions of pain: a dot-probe task modification.不同阶段的面部表情疼痛的注意力处理:一个点探测任务的修改。
J Pain. 2013 Mar;14(3):223-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.11.001. Epub 2013 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Social processing modulates the initial allocation of attention towards angry faces: evidence from the N2pc component.社会处理调节了对愤怒面孔的初始注意力分配:来自 N2pc 成分的证据。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Nov 30;18(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad070.
2
Furious snarling: Teeth-exposure and anxiety-related attentional bias towards angry faces.愤怒的咆哮:对愤怒面孔的牙齿暴露和焦虑相关注意力偏向。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 27;13(11):e0207695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207695. eCollection 2018.
3
The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies?
点探测任务测量情绪注意:在比较研究中是一种合适的测量方法吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1686-1717. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1224-1.
4
How to Modify (Implicit) Evaluations of Fear-Related Stimuli: Effects of Feature-Specific Attention Allocation.如何改变(内隐)对恐惧相关刺激的评估:特定特征注意分配的影响。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 13;7:717. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00717. eCollection 2016.
5
On the automaticity of the evaluative priming effect in the valent/non-valent categorization task.关于价态/非价态分类任务中评价性启动效应的自动性
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0121564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121564. eCollection 2015.
6
Feature-specific attention allocation overrules the orienting response to emotional stimuli.特定特征的注意力分配会推翻对情绪刺激的定向反应。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Sep;9(9):1351-9. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst121. Epub 2013 Jul 31.