Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Sep;36(9):1265-78. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182635954.
Carcinoma of the collecting ducts of Bellini and renal medullary carcinoma are rare aggressive neoplasms of putative distal nephron origin. First described in 1949, case reports and review articles constitute a major source of information on collecting duct carcinoma, whereas Davis and colleagues and the pediatric tumor registry have contributed the seminal works on renal medullary carcinoma. Here we present a detailed study of collecting duct carcinoma (n=39) and renal medullary carcinoma (n=13), characterizing these rare neoplasms and analyzing their interrelationship. Both collecting duct carcinoma and renal medullary carcinoma exhibited significant similarities, such as predilection for the right kidney, tumor mass with an epicenter in the renal medulla, and a mean size of 7 cm. Overall, both tumors exhibited a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma histology with desmoplastic stromal response (100%), inflammatory infiltrate (100%), frequent perinephric extension (collecting duct carcinoma: 97%; renal medullary carcinoma: 83%), lymphovascular invasion (100%), intraluminal mucin (collecting duct carcinoma: 42%; renal medullary carcinoma: 73%), high nuclear grade (97%), overlapping immunoreactivity for Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1 (collecting duct carcinoma: 75%; renal medullary carcinoma:55%), CK7 (collecting duct carcinoma: 44%; renal medullary carcinoma: 71%), and high-molecular weight cytokeratin (collecting duct carcinoma: 26%; renal medullary carcinoma: 29%), and nonimmunoreactivity for Ksp-cadherin. Histologically, collecting duct carcinoma frequently had tubular, tubulopapillary, or irregular glandular architecture, whereas renal medullary carcinoma commonly demonstrated islands of anastomosing tubules and cords forming irregular microcystic spaces. Multiple metastases to the lymph nodes, lung, bone, and liver were observed in both categories at presentation (collecting duct carcinoma: 17%; renal medullary carcinoma: 36%). Only patients with organ-confined small tumors were disease free beyond the median survival time. Differential clinical features between collecting duct carcinoma and renal medullary carcinoma included proclivity for younger male individuals of African ancestry with hemoglobin abnormalities and a shorter median survival of 17 weeks (vs. 44 wk for collecting duct carcinoma) for renal medullary carcinoma. The markedly overlapping clinical features, histology, immunophenotype, metastasis patterns, and uniformly aggressive outcome in collecting duct and renal medullary carcinomas suggest that renal medullary carcinoma is a distinctive clinicopathologic subtype within the entity of collecting duct carcinoma. The extremely poor prognosis and ongoing clinical trials with specific therapeutic protocols argue for their accurate distinction from other renal cell carcinoma subtypes.
Bellini 集合管癌和肾髓质癌是起源于假定远端肾单位的罕见侵袭性肿瘤。这些肿瘤于 1949 年首次被描述,病例报告和综述文章是集合管癌的主要信息来源,而 Davis 及其同事和儿科肿瘤登记处则对肾髓质癌做出了开创性的贡献。在这里,我们详细研究了集合管癌(n=39)和肾髓质癌(n=13),对这些罕见肿瘤进行了特征描述,并分析了它们之间的关系。集合管癌和肾髓质癌都具有明显的相似性,例如右肾偏好、肿瘤中心位于肾髓质、平均大小为 7cm。总体而言,两种肿瘤均表现为分化不良的腺癌组织学,伴有纤维母细胞性间质反应(100%)、炎症浸润(100%)、肾周广泛延伸(集合管癌:97%;肾髓质癌:83%)、淋巴管血管侵犯(100%)、腔内粘蛋白(集合管癌:42%;肾髓质癌:73%)、核高分级(97%)、Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1(UEA-1)重叠免疫反应(集合管癌:75%;肾髓质癌:55%)、CK7(集合管癌:44%;肾髓质癌:71%)和高分子量细胞角蛋白(集合管癌:26%;肾髓质癌:29%),以及对 Ksp-cadherin 的非免疫反应。组织学上,集合管癌通常具有管状、管状乳头状或不规则腺体结构,而肾髓质癌则常见吻合的小管和形成不规则微囊腔的条索状结构。在两个类别中,在出现时都观察到多个淋巴结、肺、骨和肝转移(集合管癌:17%;肾髓质癌:36%)。只有局限于器官的小肿瘤患者的中位生存期超过无病生存期。集合管癌和肾髓质癌之间的临床特征差异包括倾向于年轻的非洲裔男性个体,存在血红蛋白异常,肾髓质癌的中位生存期较短,为 17 周(而集合管癌为 44 周)。集合管癌和肾髓质癌的临床特征、组织学、免疫表型、转移模式和一致的侵袭性结局非常相似,提示肾髓质癌是集合管癌实体中的一个独特的临床病理亚型。极差的预后和正在进行的针对特定治疗方案的临床试验都表明,有必要将它们与其他肾细胞癌亚型准确区分。