Department of Health Sciences, University of L'Aquila, San Salvatore 1, Building Delta 6, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Sep;28(5):1393-402. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1181-5. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
To investigate whether the adjunctive use of diode laser provides additional benefits to scaling root planning alone in patients with chronic periodontitis, a meta-analysis was conducted according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement and the Cochrane Collaboration. A literature search was performed on seven databases, followed by a manual search. Weighted mean differences and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated for the clinical attachment level, probing depth, and changes in the plaque and gingival indices. The I (2) test was used for interstudy heterogeneity. Visual asymmetry inspection of the funnel plot, Egger's regression test, and the trim-and-fill method were used to investigate publication bias. All outcomes were evaluated at 6 months. No significant differences were observed for any investigated outcome of interest. No evidence of heterogeneity or publication bias was detected. These findings suggested that the use of diode laser as an adjunctive therapy to conventional nonsurgical periodontal therapy did not provide additional clinical benefit. However, given that few studies were included in the analysis, and that three of the five included studies had a high risk of bias, the results should be interpreted with caution. Important issues that remain to be clarified include the influence of smoking on clinical outcomes, the effectiveness of adjunctive diode laser on microbiological outcomes, and the occurrence of adverse events. Future long-term well-designed parallel randomized clinical trials are required to assess the effectiveness of the adjunctive use of diode laser, as well as the appropriate dosimetry and laser settings.
为了研究在慢性牙周炎患者中,激光辅助治疗是否除了牙周刮治和根面平整之外还能带来额外的益处,我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目的建议以及 Cochrane 协作组织的建议进行了荟萃分析。我们在七个数据库中进行了文献检索,然后进行了手动搜索。我们计算了临床附着水平、探诊深度以及菌斑指数和牙龈指数变化的加权均数差值和 95%置信区间。我们使用 I (2) 检验来评估研究间的异质性。我们使用漏斗图的视觉不对称检验、Egger 回归检验和修剪填充法来评估发表偏倚。所有结果均在 6 个月时进行评估。对于任何感兴趣的研究结果,都没有观察到显著差异。没有发现异质性或发表偏倚的证据。这些发现表明,将激光作为传统非手术牙周治疗的辅助治疗方法并不能提供额外的临床益处。然而,由于分析中纳入的研究较少,且五项纳入研究中有三项存在高偏倚风险,因此应谨慎解释结果。仍有一些重要问题需要阐明,包括吸烟对临床结果的影响、激光辅助治疗对微生物学结果的有效性以及不良事件的发生。需要未来进行长期、设计良好的平行随机临床试验来评估激光辅助治疗的有效性,以及适当的剂量和激光设置。