• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别单独看到或与他人一起看到的面孔:为什么两个人比一个人更难识别?

Recognising faces seen alone or with others: why are two heads worse than one?

作者信息

Bindemann Markus, Sandford Adam, Gillatt Katherine, Avetisyan Meri, Megreya Ahmed M

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NP, UK.

出版信息

Perception. 2012;41(4):415-35. doi: 10.1068/p6922.

DOI:10.1068/p6922
PMID:22896915
Abstract

The ability to identify an unfamiliar target face from an identity lineup declines when the target is accompanied by a second face during visual encoding. This two-face disadvantage is still little studied and its basis remains poorly understood. We investigated several possible explanations for this phenomenon. Experiments 1 and 2 varied the number of potential targets (1 or 2) and the number of faces in a lineup (5 or 10) to explore if this effect arises from the number of identity comparisons that need to be made to detect a target in a lineup. We also explored if this effect arises from an uncertainty concerning which is the to-be-identified target in two-face displays, by cueing the relevant face during encoding. In experiment 3 we then examined whether the two-face disadvantage reflects the depth of face encoding or a memory effect. The results show that this effect arises from the additional comparisons that are necessary to compare two potential targets to an identity lineup when memory demands are minimised (experiment 1), but it reflects a difficulty in remembering several faces when targets and lineups cannot be viewed simultaneously (experiments 2 and 3). However, in both cases the two-face disadvantage could not be eliminated fully by cueing the target. This hints at a further possible locus for this effect, which might reflect perceptual interference during the initial encoding of the target. The implications of these findings are discussed.

摘要

当在视觉编码过程中目标面孔伴有另一张面孔时,从身份列队中识别不熟悉目标面孔的能力会下降。这种双面劣势仍鲜少被研究,其根源也仍知之甚少。我们探究了对这一现象的几种可能解释。实验1和实验2改变了潜在目标的数量(1个或2个)以及列队中面孔的数量(5张或10张),以探究这种效应是否源于在列队中检测目标时需要进行的身份比较数量。我们还通过在编码过程中提示相关面孔,探究这种效应是否源于在双面展示中不确定哪个是待识别目标。在实验3中,我们接着检验双面劣势是否反映了面孔编码的深度或记忆效应。结果表明,当记忆需求最小化时,这种效应源于将两个潜在目标与身份列队进行比较时所需的额外比较(实验1),但它反映出当目标和列队不能同时查看时记住几张面孔存在困难(实验2和实验3)。然而,在这两种情况下,通过提示目标并不能完全消除双面劣势。这暗示了这种效应的另一个可能根源,可能反映了目标初始编码过程中的感知干扰。我们讨论了这些发现的意义。

相似文献

1
Recognising faces seen alone or with others: why are two heads worse than one?识别单独看到或与他人一起看到的面孔:为什么两个人比一个人更难识别?
Perception. 2012;41(4):415-35. doi: 10.1068/p6922.
2
The effect of lineup member similarity on recognition accuracy in simultaneous and sequential lineups.列队成员相似度对同时列队和连续列队中识别准确性的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2007 Feb;31(1):33-52. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9045-9.
3
Configural and component processing in simultaneous and sequential lineup procedures.同时和顺序列队程序中的构型与成分加工
Memory. 2016;24(3):306-14. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1004350. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
4
Building face composites can harm lineup identification performance.构建面部合成图像会损害列队辨认表现。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2005 Sep;11(3):147-156. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.11.3.147.
5
Spacing effects in cued-memory tasks for unfamiliar faces and nonwords.陌生面孔和非单词线索记忆任务中的间隔效应。
Mem Cognit. 2002 Dec;30(8):1238-51. doi: 10.3758/bf03213406.
6
The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.面部身份视觉记忆的激活取决于任务:来自人类电生理学的证据。
Cortex. 2014 May;54:124-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
7
Children's identification of faces from lineups: the effects of lineup presentation and instructions on accuracy.儿童从列队辨认面孔:列队展示及指示对准确性的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Sep;91(5):1102-13. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1102.
8
The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli.知名面孔与陌生面孔的运动优势:点光显示与形状归一化虚拟角色刺激的比较
Perception. 2013;42(9):950-70. doi: 10.1068/p7446.
9
The effect of exposure to multiple lineups on face identification accuracy.接触多个列队辨认对人脸识别准确性的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2001 Apr;25(2):185-98. doi: 10.1023/a:1005697431830.
10
Attending to faces: change detection, familiarization, and inversion effects.关注面孔:变化检测、熟悉度和倒置效应。
Perception. 2003;32(1):15-28. doi: 10.1068/p3460.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of facial distinctiveness in the prioritisation of targets in disjunctive dual-target face search.面部独特性在离散双目标面孔搜索中目标优先化中的作用。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Sep 13;9(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00589-z.
2
Understanding face identification through within-person variability in appearance: Introduction to a virtual special issue.理解个体间外观变化对面部识别的影响:虚拟特刊介绍。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Dec;73(12):NP1-NP8. doi: 10.1177/1747021820959068. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
3
Facial Identification at a Virtual Reality Airport.
虚拟现实机场中的面部识别。
Iperception. 2019 Jul 12;10(4):2041669519863077. doi: 10.1177/2041669519863077. eCollection 2019 Jul-Aug.
4
Showup identification decisions for multiple perpetrator crimes: Testing for sequential dependencies.多犯罪人案件中的指认识别决策:检验序列依存关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 6;13(12):e0208403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208403. eCollection 2018.
5
Human-Computer Interaction in Face Matching.面部匹配中的人机交互
Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun 28;42(5):1714-32. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12633.
6
Feature-by-feature comparison and holistic processing in unfamiliar face matching.陌生面孔匹配中的逐个特征比较与整体加工
PeerJ. 2018 Feb 26;6:e4437. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4437. eCollection 2018.