Alexander Marliese, Kirsa Sue, Mellor James D
Pharmacy Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec;8(4):319-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2011.01511.x. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
Currently multiple antithrombotic agents are used for thalidomide thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma patients. Agents used include low-dose aspirin, fixed low-dose and therapeutic warfarin and prophylactic low molecular weight heparin. To evaluate the evidence for the efficacy and safety of aspirin, warfarin and low molecular weight heparin thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma patients on thalidomide a literature search was conducted in May and June 2011. Databases searched included the Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Evidence Based Medicine Reviews and Ovid MEDLINE. The search was restricted to English language articles and limited to articles published from 2005 to 2011. Most studies consisted of small prospective cohort studies not originally designed to assess thromboprophylaxis as an outcome. A single comparative randomized trial, several retrospective review articles, two meta-analyses and two clinical practice guidelines were also identified. Current evidence fails to demonstrate a clear advantage of any particular thromboprophylaxis strategy. Results from the only prospective comparative randomized trial found no significant differences among aspirin, warfarin and low molecular weight heparin. More studies are required that consider not only efficacy and safety, but also costs, lifestyle burden and patient preference.
目前,多种抗血栓药物被用于多发性骨髓瘤患者的沙利度胺血栓预防。所使用的药物包括小剂量阿司匹林、固定低剂量和治疗剂量的华法林以及预防性低分子量肝素。为了评估阿司匹林、华法林和低分子量肝素在接受沙利度胺治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者中进行血栓预防的疗效和安全性证据,于2011年5月和6月进行了文献检索。检索的数据库包括Cochrane系统评价数据库、循证医学评价摘要数据库、循证医学综述数据库和Ovid MEDLINE。检索仅限于英文文章,且限于2005年至2011年发表的文章。大多数研究由小型前瞻性队列研究组成,这些研究最初并非设计用于评估血栓预防这一结果。还识别出一项比较随机试验、几篇回顾性综述文章、两项荟萃分析和两项临床实践指南。目前的证据未能证明任何特定血栓预防策略具有明显优势。唯一一项前瞻性比较随机试验的结果显示,阿司匹林、华法林和低分子量肝素之间无显著差异。需要开展更多研究,不仅要考虑疗效和安全性,还要考虑成本、生活方式负担和患者偏好。