Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Örebro, Örebro County Council, Örebro, Sweden.
BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Aug 17;12:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-115.
The aim of the present study is to investigate the responder rate of Electroconvulsive therapy, ECT, in clinical routine work and to define clinical characteristics predictive of response to ECT. The main hypothesis is that the responder rate of ECT might be lower in clinical routine than in controlled trials.
This is a population-based study of all patients (N = 990) treated with ECT for depressive disorders, between 2008-2010 in eight hospitals in Sweden. Patients with Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scores of 1 or 2 (much improved) within one week after ECT were considered responders to ECT. The predictive values of single clinical variables were tested by means of chi-squared tests and the relative importance was tested in a logistic regression analysis.
The responder rate was 80.1%. A higher proportion of older patients (>50 years) responded (84.3% vs. 74.2%, p < 0.001). Psychotically depressed patients responded better (88.9% vs. 81.5% for severely depressed and 72.8% for mildly depressed, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in responder rates between patients suffering from bipolar, first or recurrent major depressive syndromes, or a depressive episode of schizoaffective disorder. Patients with personality disorder had a lower responder rate (66.2% vs. 81.4%, p < 0.001). Also, outpatients had a lower responder rate (66.3%) compared to inpatients (83.4%, p < 0.001). In the logistic regression analysis, inpatient status, psychotic symptoms, absence of schizoaffective disorder and older age were independent factors associated with response to ECT.
This study focuses exclusively on the short term responder rate with ECT in clinical practice. Similarly to results from controlled trials a high responder rate is reported. Older patients, more severely ill patients, psychotically ill patients and patients without personality disorders had the highest responder rates. Inpatients may have better outcome with ECT than outpatients.
本研究旨在调查电休克疗法(ECT)在临床常规工作中的应答率,并确定对 ECT 有反应的预测临床特征。主要假设是 ECT 的应答率可能低于对照试验。
这是一项基于人群的研究,共纳入 2008-2010 年瑞典 8 家医院接受 ECT 治疗的 990 例抑郁障碍患者。ECT 后 1 周内临床总体印象-改善评分(CGI-I)为 1 或 2 分(明显改善)的患者被认为是 ECT 的应答者。采用卡方检验测试单临床变量的预测值,并在逻辑回归分析中测试相对重要性。
应答率为 80.1%。年龄较大的患者(>50 岁)应答率较高(84.3%比 74.2%,p<0.001)。精神病性抑郁患者的应答更好(88.9%比严重抑郁的 81.5%和轻度抑郁的 72.8%,p<0.001)。在患有双相、首发或复发性重度抑郁综合征或分裂情感性障碍的抑郁发作的患者之间,应答率没有显著差异。人格障碍患者的应答率较低(66.2%比 81.4%,p<0.001)。此外,门诊患者的应答率(66.3%)低于住院患者(83.4%,p<0.001)。在逻辑回归分析中,住院状态、精神病症状、无分裂情感性障碍和年龄较大是与 ECT 反应相关的独立因素。
本研究专门关注 ECT 在临床实践中的短期应答率。与对照试验结果相似,报告了高应答率。年龄较大的患者、病情较重的患者、精神病性患者和无人格障碍的患者的应答率最高。住院患者的 ECT 疗效可能优于门诊患者。