• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用脉冲光处理对牛奶和浓缩牛奶中的大肠杆菌进行灭活。

Inactivation of Escherichia coli in milk and concentrated milk using pulsed-light treatment.

机构信息

Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Stocking Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2012 Oct;95(10):5597-603. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5714. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

DOI:10.3168/jds.2012-5714
PMID:22901489
Abstract

Pulsed light (PL) treatment has been viewed as an alternative to thermal treatments for the inactivation of pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms in recent years. The objectives of this study were to quantify the effectiveness of PL on inactivating Escherichia coli in cow milk and to evaluate the effect of total solids and fat content on inactivation. Samples of reconstituted milk with variable total solids levels (9.8, 25, and 45%) and commercial cow milk with different fat contents (skim milk, 2% fat, and whole milk) were inoculated with nonpathogenic E. coli ATCC 25922 at a concentration of 10(7)cfu/mL. One milliliter of the inoculated sample was placed in a thin layer in a glass chamber and exposed to PL doses of up to 14.9 J/cm(2), both in static mode and turbulent mode. Survivors were quantified using standard plate counting. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Pulsed light treatment of the concentrated milks of 25 and 45% solids content resulted in reductions of less than 1 log, even in turbulent mode, whereas for the milk with 9.8% solids content, reduction levels of 2.5 log cfu were obtained after treatment with 8.4 J/cm(2) in turbulent mode. In the skim milk, a 3.4 log cfu reduction at 14.9 J/cm(2) was obtained and a plateau of the inactivation curve typical of PL treatment was not achieved. Under the same conditions, both 2% and whole milk attained inactivation levels greater than 2.5 log cfu. These data indicate that PL is effective for the inactivation of E. coli in milk, but has limited effectiveness for microbial inactivation in concentrated milk, due to the absorption of light by the milk solids and shielding of the bacteria in the concentrated substrates. Milk fat also diminishes the effectiveness of PL to some extent, due to light-scattering effects.

摘要

近年来,脉冲光 (PL) 处理已被视为替代热处理来灭活致病性和腐败微生物的一种方法。本研究的目的是量化 PL 对灭活牛奶中大肠杆菌的有效性,并评估总固形物和脂肪含量对失活动力学的影响。将具有不同总固形物水平(9.8%、25%和 45%)的复原乳样本和具有不同脂肪含量(脱脂乳、2%脂肪和全脂乳)的商业牛奶样本与非致病性大肠杆菌 ATCC 25922 以 10(7)cfu/mL 的浓度接种。将 1 毫升接种样本置于玻璃室中的薄层中,并以静态和湍流模式暴露于高达 14.9 J/cm(2)的 PL 剂量下。使用标准平板计数法对存活菌进行定量。所有实验均重复进行三次。对于 25%和 45%固形物含量的浓缩乳,即使在湍流模式下,脉冲光处理的减少量也不到 1 对数,而对于 9.8%固形物含量的牛奶,在湍流模式下用 8.4 J/cm(2)处理后,获得了 2.5 对数 cfu 的减少水平。在脱脂乳中,在 14.9 J/cm(2)下获得了 3.4 对数 cfu 的减少,并且没有达到 PL 处理典型的失活动力学曲线的平台。在相同条件下,2%和全脂乳均达到了大于 2.5 对数 cfu 的失活动力学水平。这些数据表明,PL 对牛奶中大肠杆菌的失活有效,但由于牛奶固形物对光的吸收和浓缩基质中细菌的屏蔽,在浓缩乳中对微生物失活的效果有限。牛奶脂肪也在一定程度上降低了 PL 的有效性,这是由于光散射效应。

相似文献

1
Inactivation of Escherichia coli in milk and concentrated milk using pulsed-light treatment.利用脉冲光处理对牛奶和浓缩牛奶中的大肠杆菌进行灭活。
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Oct;95(10):5597-603. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5714. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
2
Inactivation of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Escherichia coil O157:H7 in apple juice and apple cider, using pulsed light treatment.采用脉冲光处理对苹果汁和苹果酒中的大肠杆菌ATCC 25922和大肠杆菌O157:H7进行灭活。
J Food Prot. 2009 May;72(5):937-44. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-72.5.937.
3
Pulsed-light inactivation of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria on cheese surface.脉冲光对奶酪表面致病和腐败细菌的灭活作用。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Sep;98(9):5890-8. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9410. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
4
Inactivation effect of X-ray treatments on Cronobacter species (Enterobacter sakazakii) in tryptic soy broth, skim milk, low-fat milk and whole-fat milk.X射线处理对胰蛋白胨大豆肉汤、脱脂牛奶、低脂牛奶和全脂牛奶中阪崎肠杆菌(克罗诺杆菌属)的灭活作用。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009 Nov;49(5):562-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02706.x. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
5
Inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus in milk using flow-through pulsed UV-light treatment system.使用流通式脉冲紫外光处理系统对牛奶中的金黄色葡萄球菌进行灭活。
J Food Sci. 2007 Sep;72(7):M233-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00438.x.
6
Pulsed light and antimicrobial combination treatments for surface decontamination of cheese: Favorable and antagonistic effects.脉冲光与抗菌联合处理对奶酪表面去污的效果:有利和拮抗作用
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Mar;100(3):1664-1673. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11582. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
7
Pulsed light treatment of whole white button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus): Kinetics and mechanism of microbial inactivation and storage study.脉冲光处理整个白蘑菇(双孢蘑菇):微生物失活动力学和机制及贮藏研究。
J Food Sci. 2024 Sep;89(9):5319-5334. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.17255. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Factors affecting the inactivation of the natural microbiota of milk processed by pulsed electric fields and cross-flow microfiltration.脉冲电场和错流微滤处理的牛奶中原生菌群失活动力学的影响因素。
J Dairy Res. 2011 Aug;78(3):270-8. doi: 10.1017/S0022029911000367.
9
Efficacy of Ultraviolet (UV-C) Light in a Thin-Film Turbulent Flow for the Reduction of Milkborne Pathogens.紫外线(UV-C)光在薄膜紊流中对减少牛奶传播病原体的功效。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2015 Jun;12(6):506-13. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2014.1843. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
10
Inactivation kinetics and factors of variability in the pulsed light treatment of Listeria innocua cells.无害李斯特菌细胞脉冲光处理的失活动力学及变异因素
J Food Prot. 2007 Nov;70(11):2518-25. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-70.11.2518.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonthermal Sterilization of Animal-based Foods by Intense Pulsed Light Treatment.高强度脉冲光处理对动物性食品进行非热杀菌
Food Sci Anim Resour. 2024 Mar;44(2):309-325. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e4. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
2
Antioxidant Activity of Milk and Dairy Products.牛奶及乳制品的抗氧化活性。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jan 20;12(3):245. doi: 10.3390/ani12030245.
3
Antimicrobial Blue Light versus Pathogenic Bacteria: Mechanism, Application in the Food Industry, Hurdle Technologies and Potential Resistance.抗菌蓝光与致病细菌:作用机制、在食品工业中的应用、栅栏技术及潜在抗性
Foods. 2020 Dec 18;9(12):1895. doi: 10.3390/foods9121895.