Suppr超能文献

为什么应该优先使用术语“新生儿脑病”而不是“新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病”。

Why the term neonatal encephalopathy should be preferred over neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;208(3):176-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.07.020. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

Abstract

The unresponsiveness of the full-term newborn is sometimes attributed to asphyxia, even when no severe physiologic disturbance occurred during labor and delivery. The controversy about whether to use the name "hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy" or "newborn encephalopathy" has recently flared in publications directed toward pediatricians and neurologists. In this clinic opinion piece, I discuss the importance to obstetricians of this decision and explain why "newborn encephalopathy" should be the default term.

摘要

有时,足月新生儿的无反应性归因于窒息,即使在分娩期间没有发生严重的生理紊乱。最近,在面向儿科医生和神经科医生的出版物中,关于使用“缺氧缺血性脑病”还是“新生儿脑病”这一名称的争议愈演愈烈。在这篇临床观点文章中,我讨论了这一决策对产科医生的重要性,并解释了为什么“新生儿脑病”应该是默认术语。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验