Medical Education Development Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan.
Dent Mater. 2013 Jan;29(1):10-27. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
The incidence of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) has been increasing. The clinical performance of resin composites in NCCLS was previously unsatisfactory due to their non-retentive forms and margins lying on dentin. In order to address this problem, a lot of effort has been put into developing new dentin adhesives and restorative techniques. This article discusses these challenges and the criteria used for evaluating clinical performance as they relate to clinical studies, especially long-term clinical trials. Polymerization contraction, thermal changes and occlusal forces generate debonding stresses at adhesive interfaces.
In laboratory studies, we have investigated how these stresses can be relieved by various restorative techniques and how bond strength and durability can be enhanced. Lesion forms, restorative techniques, adhesives (adhesive strategies, bond strengths, bond durability, and the relationship between enamel and dentin bond strengths) were found to have a complex relationship with microleakage. With regard to some restorative techniques, only several short-term clinical studies were available.
Although in laboratory tests marginal sealing improved with a low-viscosity resin liner, an enamel bevel or prior enamel etching with phosphoric acid, clinical studies failed to detect significant effects associated with these techniques. Long-term clinical trials demonstrated that adhesive bonds continuously degraded in various ways, regardless of the adhesion strategy used.
Early loss of restoration may no longer be the main clinical problem when reliable adhesives are properly used. Marginal discoloration increased over time and may become a more prominent reason for repair or replacement. Reliable and standardized criteria for the clinical evaluation of marginal discoloration should be established as soon as possible and they should be based on evidence and a policy of minimal intervention.
非龋性颈壁缺损(NCCLs)的发病率一直在上升。由于树脂复合材料的非保留形式以及位于牙本质上的边缘,其在 NCCLs 中的临床性能先前并不令人满意。为了解决这个问题,人们投入了大量精力来开发新的牙本质黏结剂和修复技术。本文讨论了这些挑战以及与临床研究相关的评估临床性能的标准,特别是长期临床试验。聚合收缩、热变化和咬合力会在黏合界面产生离解应力。
在实验室研究中,我们研究了各种修复技术如何缓解这些应力,以及如何提高黏结强度和耐久性。我们发现,病变形式、修复技术、黏结剂(黏结策略、黏结强度、黏结耐久性以及牙釉质和牙本质黏结强度之间的关系)与微渗漏之间存在复杂的关系。对于一些修复技术,仅存在少数短期的临床研究。
尽管在实验室测试中,低黏度树脂衬垫、釉质斜面或磷酸预处理牙本质可以改善边缘密封,但临床研究未能检测到与这些技术相关的显著效果。长期临床试验表明,无论使用何种黏结策略,黏结都会以各种方式持续降解。
当使用可靠的黏结剂时,早期修复体丧失可能不再是主要的临床问题。边缘变色随着时间的推移而增加,可能成为修复或更换的一个更突出的原因。应尽快建立可靠和标准化的边缘变色临床评估标准,这些标准应基于证据和最小干预政策。