Italian Paralympic Committee, Rome, Italy.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 Feb;23(1):94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
The study had three purposes: to verify a hypothesized speed decrease during the 15 km cross-country sit skiing (CCSS) race; documenting this possible fatigue effect (speed decrease), to evaluate changes among the four laps in kinematics parameters (cycle speed, cycle duration, cycle length, duty cycle (percentage ratio between pushing and total cycle duration), pole inclination, trunk inclination and shoulder-hand distance); to compare the kinematics parameters in cross-country sit skiers of different level. Video recordings were carried out during the 2006 Turin Winter Paralympic Games with two conventional digital video-cameras positioned on a flat and an uphill (8.3°) track, respectively. Better performing skiers (G1) had significantly higher speeds than worse performers (G2) both in the flat (6.54 ± 0.13 vs. 5.89 ± 0.50 ms(-1) and 5.55 ± 0.14 vs. 4.62 ± 0.22 ms(-1) in the first and last lap, respectively) and in the uphill track (3.67 ± 0.45 vs. 3.05 ± 0.59 ms(-1) and 3.20 ± 0.36 vs. 2.26 ± 0.36 ms(-1) in the first and last lap, respectively). The G1 athletes were able to maintain the high-speed better than the G2 over the entire race. Significant differences in cycle length and duty cycle between groups would be justified by the higher physical fitness of G1 skiers.
验证 15 公里越野坐式滑雪(CCSS)比赛中速度的假设下降;记录这种可能的疲劳效应(速度下降),评估四个滑行圈中运动学参数(周期速度、周期持续时间、周期长度、功循环(推和总周期持续时间之间的百分比比值)、杆倾斜度、躯干倾斜度和肩手距离)的变化;比较不同水平的越野坐式滑雪者的运动学参数。在 2006 年都灵冬季残奥会期间,使用两台常规数码摄像机分别在平地和上坡(8.3°)赛道上进行视频拍摄。表现较好的运动员(G1)的速度明显高于表现较差的运动员(G2),无论是在平地(第一圈和最后一圈的速度分别为 6.54 ± 0.13 比 5.89 ± 0.50 米/秒和 5.55 ± 0.14 比 4.62 ± 0.22 米/秒)还是在上坡赛道(第一圈和最后一圈的速度分别为 3.67 ± 0.45 比 3.05 ± 0.59 米/秒和 3.20 ± 0.36 比 2.26 ± 0.36 米/秒)。G1 运动员在整个比赛中比 G2 运动员更能保持高速。G1 滑雪者的身体适应性更高,这可以解释组间在周期长度和功循环方面的显著差异。