Marsland Finn, Mackintosh Colin, Holmberg Hans-Christer, Anson Judith, Waddington Gordon, Lyons Keith, Chapman Dale
UC Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 1;12(8):e0182262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182262. eCollection 2017.
In this study micro-sensors were employed to analyse macro-kinematic parameters during a classical cross-country skiing competition (10 km, 2-lap). Data were collected from eight male participants during the Australian championship competition wearing a single micro-sensor unit (MinimaxX™, S4) positioned on their upper back. Algorithms and visual classification were used to identify skiing sub-techniques and calculate velocities, cycle lengths (CL) and cycle rates (CR) over the entire course. Double poling (DP) was the predominant cyclical sub-technique utilised (43 ± 5% of total distance), followed by diagonal stride (DS, 16 ± 4%) and kick double poling (KDP, 5 ± 4%), with the non-propulsive Tuck technique accounting for 24 ± 4% of the course. Large within-athlete variances in CL and CR occurred, particularly for DS (CV% = 25 ± 2% and CV% = 15 ± 2%, respectively). For all sub-techniques the mean CR on both laps and for the slower and faster skiers were similar, while there was a trend for the mean velocities in all sub-techniques by the faster athletes to be higher. Overall velocity and mean DP-CL were significantly higher on Lap 1, with no significant change in KDP-CL or DS-CL between laps. Distinct individual velocity thresholds for transitions between sub-techniques were observed. Clearly, valuable insights into cross-country skiing performance can be gained through continuous macro-kinematic monitoring during competition.
在本研究中,微型传感器被用于分析一场经典越野滑雪比赛(10公里,两圈)中的宏观运动学参数。在澳大利亚锦标赛期间,从八名男性参与者身上收集数据,他们在上背部佩戴单个微型传感器单元(MinimaxX™,S4)。使用算法和视觉分类来识别滑雪子技术,并计算整个赛程中的速度、周期长度(CL)和周期速率(CR)。双杖滑雪(DP)是主要使用的周期性子技术(占总距离的43±5%),其次是斜向跨步(DS,16±4%)和蹬冰双杖滑雪(KDP,5±4%),非推进性的团身技术占赛程的24±4%。运动员内部的CL和CR存在较大差异,尤其是DS(CV%分别为25±2%和15±2%)。对于所有子技术,两圈以及较慢和较快滑雪者的平均CR相似,而较快运动员在所有子技术中的平均速度有更高的趋势。第1圈的总体速度和平均DP-CL显著更高,两圈之间KDP-CL或DS-CL没有显著变化。观察到子技术之间转换的明显个体速度阈值。显然,通过在比赛期间进行连续的宏观运动学监测,可以获得有关越野滑雪表现的有价值见解。