Engelmann Carsten, Schneider Mischa, Grote Gudela, Kirschbaum Clemens, Dingemann Jens, Osthaus Alexander, Ure Benno
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Dec;22(6):439-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1322542. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
We recently reported that 5-minute work breaks every 25 minutes during long lasting laparoscopy in children (intermittent pneumoperitoneum [IPP] scheme) decrease the surgeon's stress markers such as saliva cortisol and heart rate and improve time-concentration scores significantly. Data on the impact of breaks on the patient and on the surgeon's perception of breaks, however, are still lacking.
We present the comprehensive biometry data of a randomized trial including 26 patients operated with (IPP) and 26 patients without breaks (continuous pneumoperitoneum [CPP]). Moreover, we analyzed the surgeon's perception of the break scheme using behaviorally anchored 10-point rating scales.
There were no significant intergroup differences in the pooled patients' hemodynamics including cardiac output, blood gas readings, and temperature during and after the operation. Infants <1 year of age undergoing IPP versus CPP produced significantly higher urine volumes (1.60 ± 1.8 vs. 0.67 ± 1.00 mL/h/m2, p < 0.05). The overall area under the curve (AUC) of their cardiac output was 106.7 ± 41.1 (IPP) versus 78.0 ± 41.3 (CPP). This difference became significant during long operations (p < 0.05 for AUC 150 to 270 minutes). Surgeon's break perception and acceptance: team communication shifted from an implicit "mute communication" to an explicit way "issues are outspoken" by +4.7 ± 2.6 (p < 0.05) with improved coherence between operator and assistants (+3.9 ± 2.1). However, when questioned whether there was one particular welcome (5.1 ± 1) or extremely disturbing (6.4 ± 2.4) break during the entire procedure, the latter yielded a higher score (p > 0.05). Acceptance varied according to the surgeon's own esteem of his/her work style. Operators with high self-ratings for "fast" were inclined to put up with shorter breaks ("fast" vs. "slow" = 3.5 ± 1.4 vs. 5.5 ± 0.7, p < 0.05). Overall the scheme was approved (5.9 ± 3.2).
A break scheme has no detrimental effect on patient physiology and is beneficial in infants. It needs careful tailoring to both the surgeon's work situation and self-esteem to gain acceptance.
我们最近报道,在儿童长时间腹腔镜手术期间,每25分钟进行5分钟的工作休息(间歇性气腹[IPP]方案)可降低外科医生的应激指标,如唾液皮质醇和心率,并显著提高时间集中度得分。然而,关于休息对患者的影响以及外科医生对休息的看法的数据仍然缺乏。
我们展示了一项随机试验的综合生物统计学数据,该试验包括26例接受IPP手术的患者和26例无休息(持续气腹[CPP])的患者。此外,我们使用行为锚定的10分制量表分析了外科医生对休息方案的看法。
在合并患者的血流动力学方面,包括心输出量、血气读数和手术期间及术后的体温,两组之间没有显著差异。接受IPP与CPP的1岁以下婴儿产生的尿量显著更高(1.60±1.8 vs. 0.67±1.00 mL/h/m2,p<0.05)。他们的心输出量曲线下总面积(AUC)为106.7±41.1(IPP)对78.0±41.3(CPP)。在长时间手术期间,这种差异变得显著(AUC 150至270分钟时,p<0.05)。外科医生对休息的看法和接受度:团队沟通从隐含的“无声沟通”转变为明确的“问题直言不讳”,提升了4.7±2.6(p<0.05),手术医生与助手之间的协调性也有所改善(+3.9±2.1)。然而,当被问及在整个手术过程中是否有一次特别受欢迎的(5.1±1)或极其令人不安的(6.4±2.4)休息时,后者得分更高(p>0.05)。接受度因外科医生对自己工作方式的评价而异。对“快速”自我评价较高的手术医生倾向于忍受更短的休息时间(“快速”对“缓慢”=3.5±1.4对5.5±0.7,p<0.05)。总体而言,该方案得到了认可(平均分5.9±3.2)。
休息方案对患者生理没有不利影响,对婴儿有益。需要根据外科医生的工作情况和自尊进行精心调整,以获得认可。