• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较关键质量属性以建立生物类似药的相似性。

Comparability of critical quality attributes for establishing biosimilarity.

机构信息

A Plus A Statistical Services, LLC, Lansdale, PA, U.S.A.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2013 Feb 10;32(3):462-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.5564. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1002/sim.5564
PMID:22903263
Abstract

To develop a biosimilar product, it is essential to demonstrate the biosimilarity between the proposed biosimilar product and the reference product first in terms of quality in a stepwise approach that can then help inform the extent of safety and efficacy data that will be required to establish biosimilarity. These comparability studies should have direct side-by-side comparisons of the test and the reference products. In this paper, we develop a statistical method for unpaired head-to-head quality attribute comparisons. The method uses a plausibility interval derived from comparing the reference against the reference itself as the goalpost for claiming comparability. The idea behind this is that any observed difference between the reference and the reference itself should be considered as the random noise and as a part of the variability. We illustrate the performance of the proposed method by using simulation and real data sets.

摘要

要开发一种生物类似药产品,首先必须在质量方面逐步证明所提出的生物类似药产品与参照产品具有生物类似性,这有助于确定建立生物类似性所需的安全性和疗效数据的程度。这些可比性研究应直接对试验品和参照品进行并排比较。在本文中,我们开发了一种用于非配对对头质量属性比较的统计方法。该方法使用从参照品与参照品本身的比较中得出的似然区间作为声称可比性的目标。这样做的原因是,参照品与参照品本身之间的任何观察到的差异都应被视为随机噪声,并作为变异性的一部分。我们通过使用模拟数据集和真实数据集来说明所提出方法的性能。

相似文献

1
Comparability of critical quality attributes for establishing biosimilarity.比较关键质量属性以建立生物类似药的相似性。
Stat Med. 2013 Feb 10;32(3):462-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.5564. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
2
The evaluation of biosimilarity index based on reproducibility probability for assessing follow-on biologics.基于重现性概率评估后续生物类似药的生物相似性指数评价。
Stat Med. 2013 Feb 10;32(3):406-14. doi: 10.1002/sim.5570. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
3
Considerations of critical quality attributes in the analytical comparability assessment of biosimilar products.生物类似药分析可比性评估中的关键质量属性考量
Biologicals. 2017 Jul;48:101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 May 9.
4
Impact of variability on the choice of biosimilarity limits in assessing follow-on biologics.评估后续生物类似药时,变异性对生物类似药相似性限度选择的影响。
Stat Med. 2013 Feb 10;32(3):424-33. doi: 10.1002/sim.5567. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
5
An adapted F-test for homogeneity of variability in follow-on biological products.适用于后续生物制品变异性同质性的修正 F 检验。
Stat Med. 2013 Feb 10;32(3):415-23. doi: 10.1002/sim.5568. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
6
Statistical assessment of biosimilarity based on relative distance between follow-on biologics.基于后续生物类似药之间相对距离的生物相似性的统计评估。
Stat Med. 2013 Feb 10;32(3):382-92. doi: 10.1002/sim.5582. Epub 2012 Sep 2.
7
Comments on the FDA draft guidance on biosimilar products.对 FDA 生物类似药产品指导草案的评论。
Stat Med. 2013 Feb 10;32(3):364-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.5572. Epub 2012 Aug 18.
8
Scientific considerations for assessing biosimilar products.评估生物类似药的科学考量因素。
Stat Med. 2013 Feb 10;32(3):370-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.5571. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
9
Application of the parallel line assay to assessment of biosimilar products based on binary endpoints.平行分析检测法在基于二分类终点的生物类似药评估中的应用。
Stat Med. 2013 Feb 10;32(3):449-61. doi: 10.1002/sim.5565. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
10
Comparability and biosimilarity: considerations for the healthcare provider.可比性和生物相似性:医疗保健提供者的考虑因素。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jun;28(6):1053-8. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.686902. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Protein Content and Dimer Formation in the Bevacizumab Reference Product and Biosimilar Versions Marketed in Spain.评估在西班牙销售的贝伐单抗参比制剂和生物类似药版本中的蛋白质含量及二聚体形成情况。
Pharmaceutics. 2024 Nov 26;16(12):1520. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16121520.
2
An evaluation roadmap for critical quality attributes from tier 1 in analytical similarity assessment.从分析相似性评估的第 1 层到关键质量属性的评估路线图。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 6;13(12):e0208354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208354. eCollection 2018.
3
The Assessment of Quality Attributes for Biosimilars: a Statistical Perspective on Current Practice and a Proposal.
生物类似药质量属性评估:基于现行实践的统计视角及建议
AAPS J. 2018 Nov 27;21(1):7. doi: 10.1208/s12248-018-0275-9.
4
A Calibrated Power Prior Approach to Borrow Information from Historical Data with Application to Biosimilar Clinical Trials.一种校准功率先验方法:从历史数据中借用信息并应用于生物类似药临床试验
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2017 Nov;66(5):979-996. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12204. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
5
Assessment of structural and functional similarity of biosimilar products: Rituximab as a case study.评估生物类似药的结构和功能相似性:以利妥昔单抗为例。
MAbs. 2018 Jan;10(1):143-158. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2017.1402996. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
6
Physicochemical and Biological Characterization of the Proposed Biosimilar Tocilizumab.拟生物类似药托珠单抗的物理化学和生物学特性
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4926168. doi: 10.1155/2017/4926168. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
7
Analytical Similarity Assessment in Biosimilar Studies.生物类似药研究中的分析相似性评估
AAPS J. 2016 May;18(3):670-7. doi: 10.1208/s12248-016-9882-5. Epub 2016 Feb 12.