Dreger Alice, Feder Ellen K, Tamar-Mattis Anne
J Bioeth Inq. 2012 Sep;9(3):277-294. doi: 10.1007/s11673-012-9384-9. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
Following extensive examination of published and unpublished materials, we provide a history of the use of dexamethasone in pregnant women at risk of carrying a female fetus affected by congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). This intervention has been aimed at preventing development of ambiguous genitalia, the urogenital sinus, tomboyism, and lesbianism. We map out ethical problems in this history, including: misleading promotion to physicians and CAH-affected families; de facto experimentation without the necessary protections of approved research; troubling parallels to the history of prenatal use of diethylstilbestrol (DES); and the use of medicine and public monies to attempt prevention of benign behavioral sex variations. Critical attention is directed at recent investigations by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP); we argue that the weak and unsupported conclusions of these investigations indicate major gaps in the systems meant to protect subjects of high-risk medical research.
在广泛查阅已发表和未发表的资料后,我们呈现了地塞米松在怀有受先天性肾上腺皮质增生症(CAH)影响的女胎风险孕妇中的使用历史。这种干预旨在预防生殖器模糊、泌尿生殖窦、男子气以及女同性恋倾向的发展。我们梳理了这段历史中的伦理问题,包括:对医生和受CAH影响家庭的误导性宣传;在没有经批准研究的必要保护措施的情况下进行事实上的实验;与己烯雌酚(DES)产前使用历史令人不安的相似之处;以及使用药物和公共资金试图预防良性行为性别差异。批判性关注指向美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和人类研究保护办公室(OHRP)最近的调查;我们认为这些调查得出的薄弱且无根据的结论表明,旨在保护高风险医学研究受试者的系统存在重大漏洞。