• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同时置放多条中央导管会增加中央导管相关血流感染的发生率。

Simultaneous placement of multiple central lines increases central line-associated bloodstream infection rates.

机构信息

Departments of Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2013 Feb;41(2):113-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.02.034. Epub 2012 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2012.02.034
PMID:22906872
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surveillance for central line (CL)-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) is generally advocated. However, the standard definition of this surveillance does not take into account the number of CLs in place and thus the possibility of increased infection risk with multiple CLs in place simultaneously. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that simultaneous placement of more than 1 CL is associated with an increased CLABSI rate.

METHODS

The number of CLs, CL-days, and CLABSIs and CLABSI rates with regard to the number of CLs in place simultaneously was documented in 2 intensive care units between 2001 and 2011. Standard CLABSI rates, as well as the rates for 1 CL and multiple CLs in place, were calculated.

RESULTS

The average CLABSI rate was significantly lower in patients with 1 CL in place compared with those with more than 1 CL in place (3.69 per 1,000 CL-days vs 13.09/1,000 CL-days; incidence rate ratio [IRR], 3.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.61-5.05). Importantly, all differences from the standard rate (5.94/1,000 CL-days) were significant (1 CL vs standard: IRR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51-0.74; more than 1 CL vs standard: IRR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.87-2.65; both P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that the number of CLs in place had a strong influence on CLABSI rates. Thus, we advocate stratifying patients by the number of CLs in place to take this increased risk of infection into account during surveillance.

摘要

背景

通常提倡对中心静脉置管(CL)相关血流感染(CLABSI)进行监测。然而,这种监测的标准定义没有考虑到放置的 CL 数量,因此同时存在多个 CL 会增加感染风险。在这项研究中,我们检验了同时放置多个 CL 与 CLABSI 发生率增加相关的假设。

方法

在 2001 年至 2011 年间,在 2 个重症监护病房记录了 CL 数量、CL 天数和 CLABSI 以及同时放置的 CL 数量的 CLABSI 发生率。计算了标准 CLABSI 率以及 1 个 CL 和多个 CL 同时放置的发生率。

结果

与同时放置多个 CL 的患者相比,放置 1 个 CL 的患者的 CLABSI 发生率明显更低(每 1000 CL 天 3.69 例 vs 每 1000 CL 天 13.09 例;发病率比[IRR],3.63;95%置信区间[CI],2.61-5.05)。重要的是,与标准率(每 1000 CL 天 5.94 例)的所有差异均具有统计学意义(1 个 CL 与标准率相比:IRR,0.61;95%CI,0.51-0.74;多个 CL 与标准率相比:IRR,2.23;95%CI,1.87-2.65;均 P <.0001)。

结论

我们的数据表明,放置的 CL 数量对 CLABSI 发生率有很大影响。因此,我们主张根据放置的 CL 数量对患者进行分层,以便在监测期间考虑到感染风险增加的情况。

相似文献

1
Simultaneous placement of multiple central lines increases central line-associated bloodstream infection rates.同时置放多条中央导管会增加中央导管相关血流感染的发生率。
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Feb;41(2):113-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.02.034. Epub 2012 Aug 18.
2
Time-series analysis to observe the impact of a centrally organized educational intervention on the prevention of central-line-associated bloodstream infections in 32 German intensive care units.采用时间序列分析方法,观察在德国32个重症监护病房中,一项集中组织的教育干预措施对预防中心静脉导管相关血流感染的影响。
J Hosp Infect. 2014 Aug;87(4):220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 May 15.
3
Epidemiology of central line-associated bloodstream infections in Quebec intensive care units: a 6-year review.魁北克省重症监护病房中心静脉相关血流感染的流行病学:6 年回顾。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 Apr;40(3):221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
4
Vital signs: central line-associated blood stream infections--United States, 2001, 2008, and 2009.生命体征:中心静脉导管相关血流感染——美国,2001 年、2008 年和 2009 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Mar 4;60(8):243-8.
5
Successful reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infections in a Chinese neonatal intensive care unit.中国新生儿重症监护病房中心静脉导管相关血流感染的成功减少。
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Mar 1;43(3):275-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.12.001.
6
Impact of switching from an open to a closed infusion system on rates of central line-associated bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis of time-sequence cohort studies in 4 countries.从开放式输液系统切换至密闭式输液系统对中心静脉导管相关性血流感染发生率的影响:4 国时间序列队列研究的荟萃分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Jan;32(1):50-8. doi: 10.1086/657632. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
7
Rate and time to develop first central line-associated bloodstream infections when comparing open and closed infusion containers in a Brazilian Hospital.比较巴西某医院开放式和封闭式输液容器时,发生首次中心静脉相关血流感染的比例和时间。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2009 Oct;13(5):335-40. doi: 10.1590/S1413-86702009000500004.
8
Impact of an international nosocomial infection control consortium multidimensional approach on central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in adult intensive care units in eight cities in India.国际医院感染控制联合会多维方法对印度 8 个城市成人重症监护病房中心静脉相关血流感染率的影响。
Int J Infect Dis. 2013 Dec;17(12):e1218-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
9
Pediatric Ambulatory Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections.儿科门诊中央导管相关血流感染。
Pediatrics. 2021 Jan;147(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0524. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
10
Impact of revising the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System definition for catheter-related bloodstream infection in ICU: reproducibility of the National Healthcare Safety Network case definition in an Australian cohort of infection control professionals.修订重症监护病房导管相关血流感染的国家医院感染监测系统定义的影响:澳大利亚感染控制专业人员队列中国家医疗安全网络病例定义的可重复性
Am J Infect Control. 2009 Oct;37(8):643-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Rates of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Patients With 1 vs 2 Central Venous Catheters.比较 1 根与 2 根中心静脉导管患者的中心静脉导管相关血流感染发生率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200396. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0396.
2
Promoting the role of patients in improving hand hygiene compliance amongst health care workers.促进患者在提高医护人员手部卫生依从性方面的作用。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 Jul 8;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u210787.w4336. eCollection 2016.
3
Successful continuous renal replacement therapy using two single-lumen catheters in neonates and infants with cardiac disease.
成功使用双腔单管导管在患有心脏病的新生儿和婴儿中进行持续肾脏替代治疗。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2013 Dec;28(12):2383-7. doi: 10.1007/s00467-013-2578-5. Epub 2013 Sep 1.
4
Reduction of central venous line-associated bloodstream infection rates by using a chlorhexidine-containing dressing.使用含氯己定的敷料降低中心静脉置管相关血流感染率。
Infection. 2014 Feb;42(1):155-9. doi: 10.1007/s15010-013-0519-7. Epub 2013 Aug 9.