Instrumental Analysis Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University, China.
Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2012 Oct;44(10):831-7. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gms066. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
A difference between prokaryotic RNase HII and HIII, which both belong to type 2 RNase H, is a long N-terminal extension of HIII; however, the main-fold structures of HII and HIII known as RNase H-fold are similar. To further understand the structure-function relationship of RNase HII and RNase HIII, biochemical analyses were carried out using N-terminal truncations of RNase HIII (IIIN56(Δ), IIIN81(Δ), and IIIN88(Δ)) and C-terminal truncation (IIC19(Δ)) of RNase HII from Chlamydophila pneumoniae. Compared with wild-type CpRNase HII/III, IIIN56(Δ) had no obvious variation on the cleavage site and efficiency of DNA-rN(1)-DNA/DNA (DR(1)D) and DNA-rN(4)-DNA/DNA (DR(4)D) substrates. IIC19(Δ) and IIIN81(Δ) both showed decreased activities, and IIIN88(Δ) exhibited little cleavage on these substrates. However, IIIN81(Δ) showed very different activities toward different substrates (20% for DR(1)D and 85% for DR(4)D). Moreover, IIC19(Δ)IIIN(82-88) mutant, prepared through adding N-terminal 82nd to 88th residues locating at the bound region of N- and C-terminal domains of CpRNase HIII to N-terminus of IIC19(Δ), cleaved DR(4)D substrate more efficiently and preferentially at the cleavage sites of CpRNase HIII but not those of CpRNase HII. These results indicated that C-termini of CpRNase HII, N-termini of CpRNase HIII, and bound region of N- and C-terminal domain are all important for enzymatic activities. Moreover, the 82nd to 88th residues of N-terminus of CpRNase HII are related with enzyme cleavage site specificity. These results will help to understand the importance of C-termini of CpRNase HII and N-termini of CpRNase HIII to the enzyme activities for DR(1)D and DR(4)D substrate.
原核核糖核酸酶 HII 和 HIII 都属于 2 型核糖核酸酶,它们的区别在于 HIII 具有长的 N 端延伸;然而,HII 和 HIII 的主要折叠结构被称为核糖核酸酶 H 折叠,它们是相似的。为了进一步了解核糖核酸酶 HII 和 HIII 的结构-功能关系,我们使用来自肺炎衣原体的核糖核酸酶 HIII 的 N 端截断物(IIIN56(Δ)、IIIN81(Δ)和 IIIN88(Δ))和 C 端截断物(IIC19(Δ))进行了生化分析。与野生型 CpRNase HII/III 相比,IIIN56(Δ)在 DNA-rN(1)-DNA/DNA(DR(1)D)和 DNA-rN(4)-DNA/DNA(DR(4)D)底物的切割位点和效率上没有明显变化。IIC19(Δ)和 IIIN81(Δ)的活性都降低了,而 IIIN88(Δ)对这些底物的切割活性很小。然而,IIIN81(Δ)对不同的底物表现出非常不同的活性(DR(1)D 为 20%,DR(4)D 为 85%)。此外,通过在位于 CpRNase HIII 的 N 端和 C 端结构域结合区的第 82 至 88 位残基的 N 端添加第 82 至 88 位残基,制备了 IIC19(Δ)IIIN(82-88)突变体,该突变体更有效地切割 DR(4)D 底物,并优先在 CpRNase HIII 的切割位点而不是 CpRNase HII 的切割位点进行切割。这些结果表明,CpRNase HII 的 C 端、CpRNase HIII 的 N 端以及 N 端和 C 端结构域的结合区对酶活性都很重要。此外,CpRNase HII 的 N 端的第 82 至 88 位残基与酶的切割位点特异性有关。这些结果将有助于理解 CpRNase HII 的 C 端和 CpRNase HIII 的 N 端对 DR(1)D 和 DR(4)D 底物的酶活性的重要性。