Suppr超能文献

语言学习和记忆的重复评估障碍:国际购物清单任务和 Rey 听觉言语学习测试在固着性干扰方面的比较。

Barriers to repeated assessment of verbal learning and memory: a comparison of international shopping list task and rey auditory verbal learning test on build-up of proactive interference.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 Nov;27(7):790-5. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acs074. Epub 2012 Aug 19.

Abstract

Proactive interference (PI) that remains unidentified can confound the assessment of verbal learning, particularly when its effects vary from one population to another. The International Shopping List Task (ISLT) is a new measure that provides multiple forms that can be equated for linguistic factors across cultural groups. The aim of this study was to examine the build-up of PI on two measures of verbal learning-a traditional test of list learning (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, RAVLT) and the ISLT. The sample consisted of 61 healthy adults aged 18-40. Each test had three parallel forms, each recalled three times. Results showed that repeated administration of the ISLT did not result in significant PI effects, unlike the RAVLT. Although these PI effects, observed during short retest intervals, may not be as robust under normal clinical administrations of the tests, the results suggest that the choice of the verbal learning test should be guided by the knowledge of PI effects and the susceptibility of particular patient groups to this effect.

摘要

前摄干扰(PI)如果未被识别,可能会干扰语言学习的评估,尤其是当它的影响因人群而异时。国际购物清单任务(ISLT)是一种新的测量工具,它提供了多种形式,可以在不同文化群体中进行语言因素的等价衡量。本研究的目的是在两个语言学习测量工具上检验 PI 的累积效应——传统的列表学习测试(Rey 听觉语言学习测试,RAVLT)和 ISLT。样本由 61 名年龄在 18-40 岁之间的健康成年人组成。每个测试都有三个平行的形式,每个形式都要回忆三次。结果表明,与 RAVLT 不同,ISLT 的多次使用并没有导致明显的 PI 效应。尽管在短的重测间隔期间观察到这些 PI 效应,但在测试的正常临床应用中,它们可能不会如此稳健,结果表明,语言学习测试的选择应该基于对 PI 效应的了解以及特定患者群体对这种效应的敏感性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验