Department of Biology, Clarion University, Clarion, Pennsylvania 16214, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2012 Jul;22(5):1578-88. doi: 10.1890/11-1469.1.
Forest ecosystem processes depend on local interactions that are modified by the spatial pattern of trees and resources. Effects of resource supplies on processes such as regeneration are increasingly well understood, yet we have few tools to compare resource heterogeneity among forests that differ in structural complexity. We used a neighborhood approach to examine understory light and nutrient availability in a well-replicated and large-scale variable-retention harvesting experiment in a red pine forest in Minnesota, USA. The experiment included an unharvested control and three harvesting treatments with similar tree abundance but different patterns of retention (evenly dispersed as well as aggregated retention achieved by cutting 0.1- or 0.3-ha gaps). We measured light and soil nutrients across all treatments and mapped trees around each sample point to develop an index of neighborhood effects (NI). Field data and simulation modeling were used to test hypotheses that the mean and heterogeneity of resource availability would increase with patchiness because of greater variation in competitive environments. Our treatments dramatically altered the types and abundances of competitive neighborhoods (NI) in each stand and resulted in significantly nonlinear relationships of light, nitrogen and phosphorus availability to NI. Hence, the distribution of neighborhoods in each treatment had a significant impact on resource availability and heterogeneity. In dense control stands, neighborhood variation had little impact on resource availability, whereas in more open stands (retention treatments), it had large effects on light and modest effects on soil nutrients. Our results demonstrate that tree spatial pattern can affect resource availability and heterogeneity in explainable and predictable ways, and that neighborhood models provide a useful tool for scaling heterogeneity from the individual tree to the stand. These insights are needed to anticipate the outcomes of silvicultural manipulations and should become more holistically integrated into both basic ecological and management science.
森林生态系统过程依赖于局部相互作用,而这些相互作用又受到树木和资源空间格局的影响。资源供应对再生等过程的影响越来越被人们所理解,但我们很少有工具来比较结构复杂性不同的森林之间的资源异质性。我们使用邻域方法在美国明尼苏达州的一片红松林中,对一个经过良好复制和大规模可变保留采伐实验中的林下光照和养分可利用性进行了研究。该实验包括一个未采伐的对照区和三个采伐处理区,这三个处理区的树木丰度相似,但保留模式不同(均匀分散和通过切割 0.1-或 0.3 公顷的空隙实现聚集保留)。我们在所有处理区测量光照和土壤养分,并在每个样本点周围绘制树木图,以开发邻域效应指数(NI)。现场数据和模拟模型用于检验以下假设:由于竞争环境的变化更大,资源可利用性的平均值和异质性会随着斑块性的增加而增加。我们的处理方法极大地改变了每个林分中竞争型邻域(NI)的类型和丰度,并导致光照、氮和磷可利用性与 NI 之间呈显著非线性关系。因此,每个处理区的邻域分布对资源可利用性和异质性有显著影响。在密集的对照林分中,邻域变化对资源可利用性影响很小,而在更开阔的林分(保留处理)中,它对光照有很大的影响,对土壤养分有适度的影响。我们的研究结果表明,树木的空间格局可以以可解释和可预测的方式影响资源的可利用性和异质性,而邻域模型为从单株到林分尺度上的异质性提供了一种有用的工具。这些见解对于预测森林经营管理措施的结果是必要的,并且应该更全面地纳入基础生态学和管理科学中。