School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, Washington, 98195-2100, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2021 Jun;31(4):e02296. doi: 10.1002/eap.2296. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
Variable retention (VR) has been adopted globally as an alternative to more intensive forms of regeneration harvest. By retaining live trees within harvest units, VR seeks balance among the commodity, ecological, and aesthetic values of managed forests. Achieving these multiple, often competing objectives requires an understanding of how level and spatial pattern of retention shape the abundance, growth, and mortality of regenerating and retained trees. Using long-term (18-19 yr) data from a regional-scale VR experiment, we explore the individual and interactive effects of retention level (15% vs. 40% of initial basal area) and pattern (dispersed vs. aggregated) on the post-harvest dynamics of forests of differing structure and seral composition. Level and pattern of retention imposed trade-offs for the density and growth of regenerating trees (≥0.1 m tall, <5 cm dbh) and ingrowth (trees attaining 5 cm during the study). Greater retention led to greater density of late-seral regeneration, but lower density of early-seral ingrowth, and slower growth of late-seral ingrowth. Dispersed retention enhanced the density of early- and late-seral regeneration (compared to aggregated treatments), but reduced the growth of early-seral ingrowth. We also observed trade-offs for retained trees. Lower retention enhanced the growth of smaller trees (<25 cm dbh), particularly in dispersed settings, but reduced the survival of larger trees, which were more susceptible to windthrow. Greater retention reduced the growth, but enhanced the survival of smaller trees. Pattern imposed similar trade-offs, with dispersed retention enhancing growth, but reducing survival of small trees. Finally, level and pattern resulted in trade-offs for productivity of regenerating vs. retained-tree cohorts. Ingrowth productivity was greater at lower retention and in aggregated treatments; retained-tree productivity was greater at higher retention and in dispersed treatments. Our results provide a unique, long-term perspective on the sensitivity of tree regeneration, growth, and mortality to key structural elements of VR systems. Strong responses to level and pattern of retention produce trade-offs for different ecological or resource objectives. Balancing these objectives may require the combined use of aggregates, dispersed retention, and clearings, to mimic the spatial heterogeneity of habitats, physical structures, and resource conditions that are produced by natural disturbances.
可变保留(VR)已在全球范围内被采用,作为更密集的再生收获形式的替代方案。通过在采伐单元内保留活立木,VR 试图在管理森林的商品、生态和美学价值之间取得平衡。实现这些多目标,通常是相互竞争的目标,需要了解保留的水平和空间模式如何塑造再生和保留树木的丰度、生长和死亡率。利用区域规模 VR 实验的长期(18-19 年)数据,我们探讨了保留水平(初始底面积的 15%与 40%)和模式(分散与聚集)对不同结构和演替组成森林的采伐后动态的个体和交互影响。保留水平和模式对再生树木(≥0.1m 高,<5cm 胸径)和入侵树木(研究期间达到 5cm)的密度和生长产生了权衡。较大的保留导致了后期演替更新的密度更大,但早期演替入侵的密度更小,后期演替更新的生长速度更慢。分散的保留增加了早期和后期演替更新的密度(与聚集处理相比),但降低了早期演替入侵的生长。我们还观察到了对保留树木的权衡。较低的保留增强了较小树木(<25cm 胸径)的生长,特别是在分散的环境中,但降低了较大树木的存活率,这些树木更容易受到风倒的影响。较大的保留减少了树木的生长,但增强了较小树木的存活率。模式也产生了类似的权衡,分散的保留增加了树木的生长,但降低了小树的存活率。最后,水平和模式导致了再生和保留树木群体生产力的权衡。在较低的保留和聚集处理下,入侵树木的生产力更高;在较高的保留和分散处理下,保留树木的生产力更高。我们的研究结果提供了一个独特的、长期的视角,了解树木再生、生长和死亡率对 VR 系统关键结构要素的敏感性。对保留水平和模式的强烈响应会对不同的生态或资源目标产生权衡。平衡这些目标可能需要综合使用聚集、分散保留和林窗,以模拟由自然干扰产生的栖息地、物理结构和资源条件的空间异质性。